Key Takeaways
- • Praetorian Capital, run by Harris Kupperman, gained 11.94% net of fees in 2022 despite a costly Russian asset bet that marked positions to zero and cost the fund 7.7% in losses.
- • Kupperman successfully predicted Tiger Global's technology crash and identified the "Tiger 40" (top holdings from end of 2021) as overvalued hedge fund hotels destined for selloff, avoiding significant losses by not owning those stocks.
- • A Russian venture investment strategy—entered when assets appeared distressed following Ukraine invasion—became a major error when Western investors' Russian holdings were frozen and Western sanctions escalated beyond initial expectations.
- • Praetorian's 11.94% 2022 return significantly underperformed prior years (142.87% in 2021, 129.49% in 2020), demonstrating the outsized impact of the Russia miscalculation despite broader market outperformance.
- • Kupperman characterized venture capital and much of the tech sector as the "Ponzi sector," reflecting broader bearish positioning on a space Tiger Global had aggressively funded at high valuations.
Summary
Harris Kupperman's Praetorian Capital delivered an 11.94% net return in 2022, outpacing broader equity markets despite a significant strategic miscalculation in Russian assets. The fund's year was marked by one major success—accurately predicting Tiger Global's collapse—and one major failure that cost nearly 8% in returns.
Kupperman gained visibility in 2022 for identifying Tiger Global's vulnerability through what he termed the "Tiger 40," the fund's largest 40 holdings at the end of 2021. He characterized these positions as "a list of the most over-owned hedge fund hotels," predicting their systematic selloff would drive losses across the technology sector. This thesis proved prescient as Tiger Global faced steep declines throughout 2022. Notably, Kupperman avoided the worst of the year's pain by holding no positions in those crowded growth stocks, a strategic choice that differentiated Praetorian's performance from many peers.
However, Praetorian's "Russian Adventure" proved disastrous. When Russia invaded Ukraine, Russian assets initially traded in Western markets at steep discounts, presenting what Kupperman viewed as an attractive distressed opportunity. The fund deployed capital into Russian positions anticipating a distressed value play. This calculation failed to account for escalation of the conflict and the subsequent freezing of Russian assets held by Western investors. By early 2023, as the Ukraine war approached its one-year mark, Praetorian had marked these Russian assets to zero and moved them to a side pocket. The fund acknowledged that neither the conflict's escalation nor the comprehensive freezing of Western-held Russian assets had been anticipated. This single position cost the fund 7.7% net of fees, with Kupperman noting "zero clarity on when or if we will ever have this capital returned to us."
The 11.94% return represented a sharp deceleration from prior performance. Praetorian gained 142.87% in 2021 and 129.49% in 2020, demonstrating the outsized impact of the Russia miscalculation on annual results. Since launching the fund in 2019 (which returned 14.97%), Kupperman had established a strong track record before 2022's Russia bet undermined returns. Beyond specific trades, Kupperman's public commentary positioned him as a significant skeptic of venture capital and growth technology, calling these sectors the "Ponzi sector"—language that reflected the broader 2022 market repricing of speculative assets.
Kupperman gained visibility in 2022 for identifying Tiger Global's vulnerability through what he termed the "Tiger 40," the fund's largest 40 holdings at the end of 2021. He characterized these positions as "a list of the most over-owned hedge fund hotels," predicting their systematic selloff would drive losses across the technology sector. This thesis proved prescient as Tiger Global faced steep declines throughout 2022. Notably, Kupperman avoided the worst of the year's pain by holding no positions in those crowded growth stocks, a strategic choice that differentiated Praetorian's performance from many peers.
However, Praetorian's "Russian Adventure" proved disastrous. When Russia invaded Ukraine, Russian assets initially traded in Western markets at steep discounts, presenting what Kupperman viewed as an attractive distressed opportunity. The fund deployed capital into Russian positions anticipating a distressed value play. This calculation failed to account for escalation of the conflict and the subsequent freezing of Russian assets held by Western investors. By early 2023, as the Ukraine war approached its one-year mark, Praetorian had marked these Russian assets to zero and moved them to a side pocket. The fund acknowledged that neither the conflict's escalation nor the comprehensive freezing of Western-held Russian assets had been anticipated. This single position cost the fund 7.7% net of fees, with Kupperman noting "zero clarity on when or if we will ever have this capital returned to us."
The 11.94% return represented a sharp deceleration from prior performance. Praetorian gained 142.87% in 2021 and 129.49% in 2020, demonstrating the outsized impact of the Russia miscalculation on annual results. Since launching the fund in 2019 (which returned 14.97%), Kupperman had established a strong track record before 2022's Russia bet undermined returns. Beyond specific trades, Kupperman's public commentary positioned him as a significant skeptic of venture capital and growth technology, calling these sectors the "Ponzi sector"—language that reflected the broader 2022 market repricing of speculative assets.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.