Key Takeaways
- • Viking Global Investors' flagship long/short equity hedge fund lost 1.2% in October 2026, but outperformed several Tiger Cub peers during a broad technology sell-off, according to Bloomberg.
- • The October loss cut the fund's 2026 gains to approximately 1%, according to people familiar with the firm's performance.
- • Technology stocks made up just 7.5% of Viking's long equity positions at the end of June, per regulatory filings, versus more than 40% at Coatue Management and Tiger Global and above 38% at Lone Pine Capital.
- • Peers suffered larger October losses: Lone Pine fell 9% and Tiger Global lost 8.5%, while Coatue gained 0.2%.
- • Viking retains exposure to the AI supply chain, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company as its second-largest long and Meta Platforms as its sixth-largest, while managing approximately $35bn.
Summary
Viking Global Investors' flagship hedge fund lost 1.2% in October, according to a report by Bloomberg. The decline occurred during a month marked by a broad technology sell-off, and the firm's relatively cautious approach to artificial intelligence-related investments helped it outperform several competitors. The loss reduced the long/short equity fund's gains to approximately 1% for 2026, according to people familiar with the firm's performance.
The results reflect the investment approach of co-founder Andreas Halvorsen, who has generally avoided large bets on AI-related companies where valuations appear difficult to justify against expected earnings. In a July letter to investors, Halvorsen reiterated the firm's emphasis on valuation discipline, warning that some stocks offered limited margin of safety when assessed against its revenue and earnings forecasts. Viking manages approximately $35bn and has historically taken a cautious stance on technology during periods of strong market enthusiasm. The firm largely sat out the technology rallies of 2020 and 2021, avoiding some of the double-digit losses competitors later experienced when valuations fell.
Regulatory filings show technology stocks accounted for just 7.5% of Viking's long equity positions at the end of June. The firm nonetheless retained meaningful exposure to the AI supply chain, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company as its second-largest long position and Meta Platforms as its sixth-largest. By comparison, Coatue Management and Tiger Global had allocated more than 40% of their long portfolios to technology at the end of June, while Lone Pine Capital's exposure exceeded 38%. Viking is less exposed to technology than several other hedge funds founded by former employees of Julian Robertson's Tiger Management.
The October sell-off hit several of those peers harder. Lone Pine's hedge fund fell 9% during the month, leaving it down 7% for the year. Tiger Global lost 8.5%, while Coatue gained 0.2% in October and was up 13% year to date through the end of the month. Viking's conservative positioning did not fully insulate it from market volatility, but it limited the impact of the technology correction relative to peers. The firm has previously acknowledged that the same cautious approach meant missing opportunities during the AI-driven rally.
For Halvorsen, the central challenge remains balancing the risk of overpaying for high-growth technology companies against the possibility that valuations continue to rise as AI adoption expands. October's results illustrate the benefits of avoiding crowded positions, while also highlighting the opportunity cost of a more restrained sector exposure.
The results reflect the investment approach of co-founder Andreas Halvorsen, who has generally avoided large bets on AI-related companies where valuations appear difficult to justify against expected earnings. In a July letter to investors, Halvorsen reiterated the firm's emphasis on valuation discipline, warning that some stocks offered limited margin of safety when assessed against its revenue and earnings forecasts. Viking manages approximately $35bn and has historically taken a cautious stance on technology during periods of strong market enthusiasm. The firm largely sat out the technology rallies of 2020 and 2021, avoiding some of the double-digit losses competitors later experienced when valuations fell.
Regulatory filings show technology stocks accounted for just 7.5% of Viking's long equity positions at the end of June. The firm nonetheless retained meaningful exposure to the AI supply chain, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company as its second-largest long position and Meta Platforms as its sixth-largest. By comparison, Coatue Management and Tiger Global had allocated more than 40% of their long portfolios to technology at the end of June, while Lone Pine Capital's exposure exceeded 38%. Viking is less exposed to technology than several other hedge funds founded by former employees of Julian Robertson's Tiger Management.
The October sell-off hit several of those peers harder. Lone Pine's hedge fund fell 9% during the month, leaving it down 7% for the year. Tiger Global lost 8.5%, while Coatue gained 0.2% in October and was up 13% year to date through the end of the month. Viking's conservative positioning did not fully insulate it from market volatility, but it limited the impact of the technology correction relative to peers. The firm has previously acknowledged that the same cautious approach meant missing opportunities during the AI-driven rally.
For Halvorsen, the central challenge remains balancing the risk of overpaying for high-growth technology companies against the possibility that valuations continue to rise as AI adoption expands. October's results illustrate the benefits of avoiding crowded positions, while also highlighting the opportunity cost of a more restrained sector exposure.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.