Key Takeaways
- • Lansdowne Partners exited its flagship hedge fund five years ago (circa 2020) to transition to a long-only asset management model, a strategic pivot the firm now characterizes as "vindicated" based on comparative performance.
- • Peter Davies, co-manager of the Lansdowne (Lux) Developed Markets fund, stated the firm would have "done a lot worse had we remained a hedge fund" over the past five years, indicating superior returns from the long-only strategy versus a hedge fund structure.
- • The decision to abandon short-selling was driven by market conditions lacking the classic catalyst for profitable shorts: during the pandemic and subsequent period, industries experienced capital shortages rather than excess, eliminating a primary opportunity set for short positions.
- • Valuation uncertainty in growth stocks (exemplified by Peloton and Zoom Communications) made it difficult to establish high-conviction short theses, as the potential price range for these securities became unpredictable, reducing shorting viability.
- • The pivot away from hedge fund operations reflects a broader industry challenge: the structural headwinds facing short-selling strategies in an environment characterized by capital scarcity and elevated volatility in stock valuations.
Summary
Lansdowne Partners, formerly one of Europe's largest hedge funds, executed a strategic transformation approximately five years ago by closing its flagship hedge fund and shifting entirely to long-only asset management. According to Peter Davies, co-manager of the Lansdowne (Lux) Developed Markets fund, this transition has proven strategically sound, with the firm stating there is "no doubt we would have done a lot worse running a hedge fund than running a long-only portfolio over the past five years."
The decision to exit short-selling stemmed from a fundamental reassessment of market conditions circa 2020. Davies identified two primary factors driving the pivot. First, the firm recognized that profitable short opportunities typically emerge during periods of capital excess—such as the technology bubble of the 2000s, the banking crisis of 2008-2009, or the energy sector downturn of 2015. Conversely, the pandemic period and subsequent years were characterized by capital scarcity across most industries, eliminating the classic setup for high-conviction short positions. As Davies explained, "really good shorts" arise when excess capital drives fundamental deterioration in returns; this condition did not materialize during the analyzed period.
Second, the unprecedented volatility in equity valuations during the transition created substantial uncertainty in shorting theses. Davies cited examples including fitness platform Peloton and video conferencing provider Zoom Communications—companies that Lansdowne might have targeted for short positions under historical frameworks. However, the unpredictability of terminal valuations for these growth stocks (with potential price targets ranging widely from $200 to $500+) rendered short theses insufficiently robust for confident execution. This valuation uncertainty effectively eliminated a critical risk-management tool for short-sellers: the ability to estimate downside scenarios with reasonable confidence.
The firm's vindication in this strategic call reflects broader headwinds facing the hedge fund industry, particularly strategies dependent on short-selling. The long-only pivot has positioned Lansdowne to benefit from the extended equity bull market while avoiding the structural constraints that constrained traditional hedge fund returns during this period. The successful transition underscores how changing market microstructure—capital allocation patterns, valuation volatility, and reduced short opportunity sets—can justify fundamental business model recalibration by established asset managers.
The decision to exit short-selling stemmed from a fundamental reassessment of market conditions circa 2020. Davies identified two primary factors driving the pivot. First, the firm recognized that profitable short opportunities typically emerge during periods of capital excess—such as the technology bubble of the 2000s, the banking crisis of 2008-2009, or the energy sector downturn of 2015. Conversely, the pandemic period and subsequent years were characterized by capital scarcity across most industries, eliminating the classic setup for high-conviction short positions. As Davies explained, "really good shorts" arise when excess capital drives fundamental deterioration in returns; this condition did not materialize during the analyzed period.
Second, the unprecedented volatility in equity valuations during the transition created substantial uncertainty in shorting theses. Davies cited examples including fitness platform Peloton and video conferencing provider Zoom Communications—companies that Lansdowne might have targeted for short positions under historical frameworks. However, the unpredictability of terminal valuations for these growth stocks (with potential price targets ranging widely from $200 to $500+) rendered short theses insufficiently robust for confident execution. This valuation uncertainty effectively eliminated a critical risk-management tool for short-sellers: the ability to estimate downside scenarios with reasonable confidence.
The firm's vindication in this strategic call reflects broader headwinds facing the hedge fund industry, particularly strategies dependent on short-selling. The long-only pivot has positioned Lansdowne to benefit from the extended equity bull market while avoiding the structural constraints that constrained traditional hedge fund returns during this period. The successful transition underscores how changing market microstructure—capital allocation patterns, valuation volatility, and reduced short opportunity sets—can justify fundamental business model recalibration by established asset managers.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.