Key Takeaways
- • Valuation disparities are widening across global markets, creating opportunities for investors to capitalize on undervalued international and emerging market assets positioned beyond U.S. borders, according to Arup Datta, Senior Vice-President and Head of Global Quantitative Equity Team at Mackenzie Investments.
- • International stock valuations are generally more attractive than U.S. valuations, with a potential softening dollar serving as a potential tailwind for non-U.S. equity exposure in 2026 and beyond.
- • Emerging markets offer higher-growth exposure, attractive yields, and diversification benefits, though investors must acknowledge greater volatility and currency risk compared to developed market investments.
- • Selectivity and risk management are critical when investing in emerging markets, which face geopolitical tensions, political risk, corporate governance concerns, and weaker institutional track records than developed economies.
- • International equities outpaced U.S. stocks in prior periods, reversing the U.S. market's long-standing dominance and suggesting cyclical opportunity for global diversification strategies.
Summary
As valuation disparities widen across global equity markets, institutional investors face a compelling restatement of the case for international and emerging market exposure. According to BNN Bloomberg's coverage, Arup Datta, Senior Vice-President and Head of Global Quantitative Equity Team at Mackenzie Investments, identifies overlooked potential in regions beyond U.S. borders where valuations remain depressed relative to fundamentals.
The core thesis centers on relative valuation compression. International stock valuations are currently more attractive than their U.S. counterparts, while emerging markets remain underweighted in many institutional portfolios despite offering exposure to faster-growing economies. A potential softening in the U.S. dollar could amplify returns for foreign currency-denominated investments, adding a currency tailwind to fundamental equity returns. This combination—cheaper valuations plus favorable currency dynamics—creates the structural conditions for rebalancing.
However, emerging market investing requires disciplined selectivity. These asset classes carry materially higher volatility and currency risk than developed markets. Geopolitical tensions, political instability, weaker corporate governance frameworks, and higher costs of local currency financing remain persistent headwinds. Investors often cite these structural risks as reasons for underallocation, but such caution may simultaneously explain the valuation discount available to risk-tolerant allocators.
The broader strategic context reflects a cyclical pattern: international equities have previously outpaced U.S. stocks, reversing the U.S. market's multi-year dominance. Emerging market debt specifically offers LGPS funds and similar institutions higher-growth exposure with attractive yields and portfolio diversification alongside ESG progress metrics. The key insight is that overshadowing of emerging markets by developed markets—and the U.S. specifically—may position investors to miss direct exposure to both the best absolute values and structural growth trends embedded in developing economies.
For hedge funds, family offices, and institutional managers, the message is clear: valuation gaps persist where consensus has grown complacent about non-U.S. markets. Tactical reallocation toward international and emerging equities, with appropriate risk controls, aligns with both value and long-term structural growth narratives.
The core thesis centers on relative valuation compression. International stock valuations are currently more attractive than their U.S. counterparts, while emerging markets remain underweighted in many institutional portfolios despite offering exposure to faster-growing economies. A potential softening in the U.S. dollar could amplify returns for foreign currency-denominated investments, adding a currency tailwind to fundamental equity returns. This combination—cheaper valuations plus favorable currency dynamics—creates the structural conditions for rebalancing.
However, emerging market investing requires disciplined selectivity. These asset classes carry materially higher volatility and currency risk than developed markets. Geopolitical tensions, political instability, weaker corporate governance frameworks, and higher costs of local currency financing remain persistent headwinds. Investors often cite these structural risks as reasons for underallocation, but such caution may simultaneously explain the valuation discount available to risk-tolerant allocators.
The broader strategic context reflects a cyclical pattern: international equities have previously outpaced U.S. stocks, reversing the U.S. market's multi-year dominance. Emerging market debt specifically offers LGPS funds and similar institutions higher-growth exposure with attractive yields and portfolio diversification alongside ESG progress metrics. The key insight is that overshadowing of emerging markets by developed markets—and the U.S. specifically—may position investors to miss direct exposure to both the best absolute values and structural growth trends embedded in developing economies.
For hedge funds, family offices, and institutional managers, the message is clear: valuation gaps persist where consensus has grown complacent about non-U.S. markets. Tactical reallocation toward international and emerging equities, with appropriate risk controls, aligns with both value and long-term structural growth narratives.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.