Key Takeaways
- • Access alone insufficient for financial inclusion: Simply opening bank accounts or enabling digital payment access does not guarantee consumers will effectively use financial technology; many newly opened accounts remain inactive due to user hesitation around mistakes, hidden fees, and fraud risk.
- • Repeated use drives competency and confidence: Research by Breza, Kanz, and Klapper (Journal of Finance, 2026) demonstrates that workers receiving automatic payroll deposits into their accounts interact with the technology monthly, rapidly building comfort and independence without requiring ongoing assistance.
- • Behavioral barriers persist post-onboarding: Financial inexperience creates psychological obstacles—lack of confidence, fear of error, and security concerns—that prevent account activation despite successful initial access, indicating that financial inclusion strategy must address education alongside infrastructure.
- • Transaction independence accelerates through consistent engagement: Repeated account interaction correlates with increased independent transaction volume and improved navigation of digital financial services, suggesting that sustained usage patterns, rather than one-time access, drive measurable behavioral change.
Summary
Financial inclusion has traditionally been framed as a problem of access. Policy initiatives and fintech companies have prioritized account opening, mobile application downloads, and digital payment enablement, operating under the assumption that providing these tools would naturally produce better financial outcomes for underbanked and unbanked populations. However, recent academic research challenges this foundational premise, revealing that access represents only the initial step in a longer journey toward financial capability.
A 2026 study by Emily Breza, Martin Kanz, and Leora Klapper, published in the Journal of Finance, directly addresses the gap between account availability and actual usage. The research identifies a critical behavioral phenomenon: many newly opened accounts remain inactive despite successful onboarding. This inactivity stems not from lack of access but from user hesitation rooted in legitimate concerns—fear of making costly mistakes, uncertainty about hidden fees, and anxiety about fraud exposure. For financially inexperienced consumers, these psychological barriers create sufficient friction to prevent meaningful engagement with the technology.
The study's key finding isolates the mechanism driving behavioral change: repeated use. By distinguishing between consumers who simply received account access and those whose wages were directly deposited into those accounts, the researchers demonstrated that automatic payroll deposits create a forced, recurring interaction pattern. Workers receiving monthly deposits developed rapid familiarity with the platform, conducted increasingly complex transactions independently, and reported growing confidence navigating digital financial services without external assistance. This pattern suggests that repeated, low-stakes engagement—driven by necessity rather than choice—accelerates the learning curve more effectively than instruction alone.
The implications for fintech strategy and policy are substantial. Initiatives focused exclusively on account opening miss a critical stage in the consumer journey. Financial institutions and policymakers must embed educational support and confidence-building mechanisms into the ongoing user experience, not just the onboarding phase. The evidence suggests that sustainable financial inclusion requires combining technology access with sustained engagement mechanisms that generate repeated interaction, allowing consumers to learn through experience while building both competency and trust in the digital financial system.
A 2026 study by Emily Breza, Martin Kanz, and Leora Klapper, published in the Journal of Finance, directly addresses the gap between account availability and actual usage. The research identifies a critical behavioral phenomenon: many newly opened accounts remain inactive despite successful onboarding. This inactivity stems not from lack of access but from user hesitation rooted in legitimate concerns—fear of making costly mistakes, uncertainty about hidden fees, and anxiety about fraud exposure. For financially inexperienced consumers, these psychological barriers create sufficient friction to prevent meaningful engagement with the technology.
The study's key finding isolates the mechanism driving behavioral change: repeated use. By distinguishing between consumers who simply received account access and those whose wages were directly deposited into those accounts, the researchers demonstrated that automatic payroll deposits create a forced, recurring interaction pattern. Workers receiving monthly deposits developed rapid familiarity with the platform, conducted increasingly complex transactions independently, and reported growing confidence navigating digital financial services without external assistance. This pattern suggests that repeated, low-stakes engagement—driven by necessity rather than choice—accelerates the learning curve more effectively than instruction alone.
The implications for fintech strategy and policy are substantial. Initiatives focused exclusively on account opening miss a critical stage in the consumer journey. Financial institutions and policymakers must embed educational support and confidence-building mechanisms into the ongoing user experience, not just the onboarding phase. The evidence suggests that sustainable financial inclusion requires combining technology access with sustained engagement mechanisms that generate repeated interaction, allowing consumers to learn through experience while building both competency and trust in the digital financial system.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.