Key Takeaways
- • Josh Blanchfield, former Bridgewater co-head of trading during the 2008 financial crisis, now runs Avos Capital, a concentrated commodities and macro fund that emphasizes risk awareness and granular flow analysis over traditional top-down supply-demand models.
- • China is identified as "ground zero" for global commodities pricing, with its import cuts, strategic stockpiling, and scrap policies directly shaping outcomes in oil, copper, gold, and uranium markets—understanding participant behavior and flows is critical to predicting price movements.
- • Oil prices did not reach $300 due to fundamental market dynamics that prevented the dramatic spike some predicted; the discussion emphasizes why simplistic supply-demand frameworks fail to capture the complexity of commodity price formation.
- • Avos Capital constructs convex, options-heavy trades designed to capture upside tail risk while mitigating downside exposure, informed by micro-level analysis such as Chinese speculative flows around Lunar New Year, refinery outages, and crack spreads.
- • Uranium markets exhibit inelastic demand characteristics with specific buyer behavior patterns; gold demand from Chinese investors and copper supply dynamics present distinct alpha opportunities when analyzed through behavioral and flow-based lenses rather than conventional macro frameworks.
Summary
Josh Blanchfield brings two decades of elite institutional experience to his role as head of Avos Capital, a commodities and macro-focused investment manager. His background spans Harvard physics studies, professional poker, and 11 years at Bridgewater Associates—including a critical stint co-heading the trading desk during the 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse. This experience shaped a distinctive investment philosophy that blends macro-level analysis with micro-level flow detection and behavioral observation.
The central thesis driving Avos's strategy positions China as the dominant force determining global commodity prices. Rather than relying on traditional supply-demand equilibrium models, Blanchfield argues that understanding China's import policies, state-level stockpiling decisions, and scrap recycling regulations provides superior insight into commodity pricing. This framework explains why oil prices did not reach the $300 per barrel levels some market participants anticipated: the interaction of Chinese demand management, participant positioning, and flow dynamics created a more complex pricing reality than simple shortage scenarios suggested.
Avos's approach combines macro-level directional views with granular micro-analysis across multiple commodities. The fund targets convex payoff profiles through options-heavy positioning, allowing it to capture significant upside moves while constraining losses. Specific trading examples include monitoring Chinese speculative flows around Lunar New Year calendar anomalies, analyzing refinery outages and crack spread dynamics, and exploiting uranium's inelastic buyer base. Gold demand from Chinese investors and copper supply constraints represent distinct analytical opportunities when examined through behavioral and participant-flow perspectives.
Beyond commodities, Blanchfield discusses broader themes including Bridgewater's radical transparency culture, artificial intelligence's potential as a force multiplier for research capabilities, labor market disruption risks from AI acceleration, the structural drivers of dollar dominance beyond petrodollar narratives, and contrarian views on assets ranging from municipal bonds to equities. The conversation reflects a systematic challenge to conventional wisdom across multiple asset classes and economic narratives.
The central thesis driving Avos's strategy positions China as the dominant force determining global commodity prices. Rather than relying on traditional supply-demand equilibrium models, Blanchfield argues that understanding China's import policies, state-level stockpiling decisions, and scrap recycling regulations provides superior insight into commodity pricing. This framework explains why oil prices did not reach the $300 per barrel levels some market participants anticipated: the interaction of Chinese demand management, participant positioning, and flow dynamics created a more complex pricing reality than simple shortage scenarios suggested.
Avos's approach combines macro-level directional views with granular micro-analysis across multiple commodities. The fund targets convex payoff profiles through options-heavy positioning, allowing it to capture significant upside moves while constraining losses. Specific trading examples include monitoring Chinese speculative flows around Lunar New Year calendar anomalies, analyzing refinery outages and crack spread dynamics, and exploiting uranium's inelastic buyer base. Gold demand from Chinese investors and copper supply constraints represent distinct analytical opportunities when examined through behavioral and participant-flow perspectives.
Beyond commodities, Blanchfield discusses broader themes including Bridgewater's radical transparency culture, artificial intelligence's potential as a force multiplier for research capabilities, labor market disruption risks from AI acceleration, the structural drivers of dollar dominance beyond petrodollar narratives, and contrarian views on assets ranging from municipal bonds to equities. The conversation reflects a systematic challenge to conventional wisdom across multiple asset classes and economic narratives.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.