Key Takeaways
- • Semi-liquid private credit funds, structured as U.S. interval funds or non-traded BDCs, typically permit repurchases of up to about 5% of fund shares per quarter, according to disclosures cited in the article.
- • Semi-liquid structures do not offer daily liquidity; redemptions are quarterly, priced on NAV, capped at a percentage of the fund, and may carry early-exit fees tied to holding periods.
- • Redemption capital is typically drawn first from cash and naturally occurring portfolio cash flows, including interest and principal repayments on private credit loans, with other sources such as new subscriptions, credit facilities, and asset sales available as needed.
- • The structure is designed to extend access to private credit to wealth management and individual investors who would otherwise be unable to commit to traditional closed-end funds with long lock-up periods.
Summary
Private credit funds were originally built around closed-end vehicles that lock up investor capital for long periods. In recent years, the semi-liquid fund structure has expanded as a way to offer investors a degree of liquidity while still holding illiquid assets such as private credit loans. The article describes the core mechanism as periodic share repurchases up to a set percentage of fund shares each quarter. In U.S. interval funds and non-traded BDCs, disclosures from private credit funds show liquidity provided at approximately 5% per quarter.
The article stresses that semi-liquid does not mean daily liquidity. Unlike a conventional mutual fund, investors cannot redeem freely each day. Typical terms include quarterly redemption windows, buybacks priced on net asset value, a cap of up to 5% of the total fund, and fees for exiting before a specified holding period.
The structure responds to a structural tension in private credit. Traditional private credit funds, in which limited partners make capital commitments for the life of the fund, suit the illiquidity of underlying loans but leave investors with capital locked up for extended periods. Periodic redemption windows allow semi-liquid funds to reach a broader investor base, particularly within private market products aimed at wealth management and individual investors.
To meet redemption requests, the fund requires cash. According to the article, potential sources include existing cash and cash equivalents, new subscriptions, loan repayments, sales of liquid assets, credit facilities, and sales of private assets. The fund typically draws first on cash or naturally occurring portfolio cash flows. Because interest and principal payments from private credit loans are regular inflows, they can also fund redemptions. The article's framing implies that managers must balance these sources against the quarterly cap and the liquidity risks inherent in lending to hard-to-sell borrowers.
The article stresses that semi-liquid does not mean daily liquidity. Unlike a conventional mutual fund, investors cannot redeem freely each day. Typical terms include quarterly redemption windows, buybacks priced on net asset value, a cap of up to 5% of the total fund, and fees for exiting before a specified holding period.
The structure responds to a structural tension in private credit. Traditional private credit funds, in which limited partners make capital commitments for the life of the fund, suit the illiquidity of underlying loans but leave investors with capital locked up for extended periods. Periodic redemption windows allow semi-liquid funds to reach a broader investor base, particularly within private market products aimed at wealth management and individual investors.
To meet redemption requests, the fund requires cash. According to the article, potential sources include existing cash and cash equivalents, new subscriptions, loan repayments, sales of liquid assets, credit facilities, and sales of private assets. The fund typically draws first on cash or naturally occurring portfolio cash flows. Because interest and principal payments from private credit loans are regular inflows, they can also fund redemptions. The article's framing implies that managers must balance these sources against the quarterly cap and the liquidity risks inherent in lending to hard-to-sell borrowers.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.