AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Private credit: More Casper the Friendly Ghost than A Nightmare on Elm Street -

Reported by Bondvigilantes
Oct 29, 2026· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • Kroll Stepstone, writing on the Bond Vigilantes blog as of Q1 2026, argues that private credit's perceived risks are often overstated when examined through fundamental credit analysis.
  • • A BlackRock survey, reported by the Financial Times, found that around three quarters of insurers expect to increase allocations to private markets over the coming year.
  • • The piece frames private credit as an umbrella term spanning investment-grade-style opportunities to higher-yielding lending, so risk must be assessed by segment rather than as a single asset class.
  • • Significant risk transfer (SRT) tranches, European direct lending and infrastructure debt are cited as examples where structural protections and contracted cash flows reduce perceived risk.
  • • The author concludes that investors should separate real risks from imagined ones through underwriting, seniority analysis and relative value.
Summary
A Kroll Stepstone commentary published on the Bond Vigilantes blog argues that private credit has attracted ominous headlines in 2026 but that institutional investors may find the asset class less risky than perceived. The piece cites a recent BlackRock survey, reported by the Financial Times, in which around three quarters of insurers said they expect to increase their allocations to private markets over the coming year.

The author stresses that private credit is not a single homogeneous asset class but an umbrella term covering many forms of lending across a broad risk spectrum. According to the piece, public and private credit draw on the same underwriting fundamentals, namely assessing a borrower's ability to repay and examining the seniority and security behind a loan. The author argues that fundamental credit analysis, default-risk assessment, structural protections and relative-value considerations can clarify what is actually at stake.

The commentary highlights three segments. Significant risk transfer transactions reference portfolios of performing, underwritten loans, allowing banks to shift a portion of credit risk and manage regulatory capital. Tranching allows the first-loss equity layer to absorb defaults in exchange for higher return potential, while the senior mezzanine tranche can display investment-grade-style characteristics. European direct lending, the author notes, has historically shown lower default rates, stricter underwriting, stronger maintenance covenants, lower leverage and higher equity cushions, with most borrowers being mature mid-market companies, over half in defensive industries. Infrastructure debt finances assets such as renewable energy grids, regulated utilities, airports, ports and digital networks, often supported by inflation-linked cash flows under long-term government or corporate contracts.

The author acknowledges that much of the recent scrutiny has focused on US direct lending, where some risk appetite has been more aggressive. The overall conclusion is that some private credit risks warrant caution while others can be understood, structured and appropriately priced. The source is identified as Kroll Stepstone, as of Q1 2026.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Bondvigilantes Private credit: More Casper the Friendly Ghost than A Nightmare on Elm Street -