Key Takeaways
- • President Trump is expected to issue an executive order encouraging increased private equity and private market investments in the $12.2 trillion defined contribution (401(k)) sector, though the president lacks authority to mandate adoption since these investments are already legally available in retirement plans.
- • Retirement experts remain divided on the merits of private equity in 401(k)s: proponents cite access to higher returns via the "illiquidity premium," while critics highlight volatility, illiquidity constraints, higher fee structures, and ERISA litigation risks for plan sponsors.
- • Primary concerns center on liquidity mismatches—participants may face difficulty accessing hardship withdrawals or executing retirement decumulation strategies when capital is locked in illiquid private equity holdings.
- • An executive order could ease litigation concerns for 401(k) plan sponsors that have already explored adding private equity to their target-date or diversified investment offerings, similar to how recent Department of Labor guidance clarified cryptocurrency eligibility.
- • The regulatory and fiduciary framework already permits private equity in 401(k) plans; ERISA does not restrict plan fiduciaries from including private offerings provided proper vetting and oversight standards are met.
Summary
President Trump is expected to issue an executive order in the coming weeks that would encourage greater adoption of private equity and other private market investments in defined contribution plans, according to sources familiar with the matter. The $12.2 trillion 401(k) sector could see material shifts in asset allocation if the directive gains traction, though the executive branch cannot mandate increased use of these investments. Private equity and private market assets are already legally available within retirement plans; the executive order would function as encouragement rather than mandate, mirroring the Department of Labor's recent approach to clarifying cryptocurrency eligibility in 401(k) plans.
The investment community is sharply divided on whether private equity belongs in 401(k) plans. Advocates argue that broadening access would allow individual investors to capture the "illiquidity premium"—the elevated returns private equity historically generates—democratizing wealth-building opportunities previously confined to institutional and high-net-worth investors. However, legal and fiduciary experts raise significant structural concerns. Jerry Schlichter, founder and managing partner of Schlichter Bogard law firm, characterizes the fit as a "square peg in a round hole," underscoring fundamental incompatibilities between the asset class and plan participant needs.
Liquidity emerges as the central friction point. Private equity investments are inherently illiquid, creating operational challenges for 401(k) participants who require access to capital during hardship situations, job transitions, or systematic retirement withdrawals. Additionally, private market investments typically carry substantially higher fee structures than traditional equities or fixed income, exposing plan sponsors to potential Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) litigation alleging breach of fiduciary duty. Plan fiduciaries must conduct rigorous vetting of any private offerings under ERISA's prudence standard.
An executive order could provide regulatory clarity and potentially reduce litigation exposure for forward-thinking plan sponsors that have already integrated private equity into target-date funds or other diversified investment options. However, plan sponsors remain responsible for ensuring that any private market exposure serves the long-term interests of participants and complies with ERISA's demanding fiduciary standards. The regulatory framework does not restrict private investments in 401(k) plans; the open question for institutional stakeholders is whether the risk-return profile and liquidity characteristics genuinely align with defined contribution plan design and participant demographics.
The investment community is sharply divided on whether private equity belongs in 401(k) plans. Advocates argue that broadening access would allow individual investors to capture the "illiquidity premium"—the elevated returns private equity historically generates—democratizing wealth-building opportunities previously confined to institutional and high-net-worth investors. However, legal and fiduciary experts raise significant structural concerns. Jerry Schlichter, founder and managing partner of Schlichter Bogard law firm, characterizes the fit as a "square peg in a round hole," underscoring fundamental incompatibilities between the asset class and plan participant needs.
Liquidity emerges as the central friction point. Private equity investments are inherently illiquid, creating operational challenges for 401(k) participants who require access to capital during hardship situations, job transitions, or systematic retirement withdrawals. Additionally, private market investments typically carry substantially higher fee structures than traditional equities or fixed income, exposing plan sponsors to potential Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) litigation alleging breach of fiduciary duty. Plan fiduciaries must conduct rigorous vetting of any private offerings under ERISA's prudence standard.
An executive order could provide regulatory clarity and potentially reduce litigation exposure for forward-thinking plan sponsors that have already integrated private equity into target-date funds or other diversified investment options. However, plan sponsors remain responsible for ensuring that any private market exposure serves the long-term interests of participants and complies with ERISA's demanding fiduciary standards. The regulatory framework does not restrict private investments in 401(k) plans; the open question for institutional stakeholders is whether the risk-return profile and liquidity characteristics genuinely align with defined contribution plan design and participant demographics.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.