Key Takeaways
- • Spreadsheet Dependency Remains High Risk: 60% of surveyed private capital firms still rely on spreadsheets to manage compensation and carry programs, despite growing complexity and compliance demands, while only approximately 50% have migrated to purpose-built software solutions.
- • Complexity as Primary Operational Challenge: 40% of respondents identified growing complexity in compensation and carry management as their top challenge, driven by diverse fund structures, multiple waterfall models (European vs. American), deal-by-deal incentives, and hybrid co-investment arrangements.
- • Co-Investment Requirements Underutilized: Only 25% of firms require employee co-investment as a qualifying condition for carry eligibility, and among those that do implement this requirement, more than half fail to offer sufficient support mechanisms or structured programs.
- • Survey Scope and Respondent Base: Allvue's 2025 Carry & Compensation Survey gathered insights from senior executives at private capital firms managing between $1 billion and $100 billion in assets under management, covering private equity, venture capital, and private credit sectors.
- • Communication and Transparency Gaps: Firms are shifting their approach to how carried interest value is communicated to employees, signaling recognition that clearer articulation of incentive structures is essential for talent retention and competitive positioning.
Summary
Allvue Systems' 2025 Carry & Compensation Survey reveals significant operational and strategic gaps in how private capital firms structure and manage compensation programs for investment professionals. The survey, which gathered responses from senior executives at firms managing $1 billion to $100 billion in assets, exposes a disconnect between the demands of modern private markets and the tools and processes firms have deployed to meet them.
The most alarming finding concerns technology infrastructure. Despite intensifying regulatory scrutiny around carried interest reporting and the proliferation of complex fund structures, 60% of surveyed firms continue to rely on spreadsheets as their primary compensation management tool. This dependency creates substantial compliance risk, particularly as firms scale operations across multiple geographies, fund vintages, and incentive models. Roughly half of the survey respondents have migrated to purpose-built software solutions, signaling that modernization is occurring, but the slower adoption rate among the remaining firms suggests capacity constraints or organizational resistance to operational transformation.
Complexity emerges as the defining challenge facing the sector. Forty percent of respondents identified growing complexity in compensation and carry administration as their top operational concern. This complexity is multifaceted: firms must navigate European and American waterfall structures, integrate deal-by-deal incentive models, manage hybrid co-investment vehicles, and maintain compliance across evolving regulatory frameworks. The proliferation of bespoke arrangements—while necessary to attract and retain talent in a competitive market—has made standardized processes increasingly untenable.
The survey also highlights a critical gap in co-investment strategy. Only 25% of firms require employee co-investment as a qualifying condition for carry participation. Among firms that do impose this requirement, more than half lack adequate support infrastructure—such as capital call mechanisms, favorable financing terms, or employee education programs—to make meaningful co-investment accessible to broader employee bases. This underinvestment in co-investment structures may reflect both cost consciousness and a failure to recognize the alignment benefits such programs provide.
Additionally, the report indicates that firms are reassessing how they communicate the value of carried interest to employees. This shift suggests recognition that transparency and clear articulation of incentive structures are critical levers for talent retention and market competitiveness. As the survey concludes, firms that modernize compensation infrastructure and clarify carry communication now will be better positioned to scale and compete in an increasingly complex private markets environment.
The most alarming finding concerns technology infrastructure. Despite intensifying regulatory scrutiny around carried interest reporting and the proliferation of complex fund structures, 60% of surveyed firms continue to rely on spreadsheets as their primary compensation management tool. This dependency creates substantial compliance risk, particularly as firms scale operations across multiple geographies, fund vintages, and incentive models. Roughly half of the survey respondents have migrated to purpose-built software solutions, signaling that modernization is occurring, but the slower adoption rate among the remaining firms suggests capacity constraints or organizational resistance to operational transformation.
Complexity emerges as the defining challenge facing the sector. Forty percent of respondents identified growing complexity in compensation and carry administration as their top operational concern. This complexity is multifaceted: firms must navigate European and American waterfall structures, integrate deal-by-deal incentive models, manage hybrid co-investment vehicles, and maintain compliance across evolving regulatory frameworks. The proliferation of bespoke arrangements—while necessary to attract and retain talent in a competitive market—has made standardized processes increasingly untenable.
The survey also highlights a critical gap in co-investment strategy. Only 25% of firms require employee co-investment as a qualifying condition for carry participation. Among firms that do impose this requirement, more than half lack adequate support infrastructure—such as capital call mechanisms, favorable financing terms, or employee education programs—to make meaningful co-investment accessible to broader employee bases. This underinvestment in co-investment structures may reflect both cost consciousness and a failure to recognize the alignment benefits such programs provide.
Additionally, the report indicates that firms are reassessing how they communicate the value of carried interest to employees. This shift suggests recognition that transparency and clear articulation of incentive structures are critical levers for talent retention and market competitiveness. As the survey concludes, firms that modernize compensation infrastructure and clarify carry communication now will be better positioned to scale and compete in an increasingly complex private markets environment.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.