Key Takeaways
- • Apollo Global Management avoided significant portfolio damage from the software sector downturn by maintaining near-zero software exposure across its private equity business and Athene balance sheet, positioning it ahead of competitors facing valuation pressures in the sector.
- • Apollo cut direct lending fund software exposure by approximately 50% in 2025, reducing from roughly 20% at the start of the year, demonstrating proactive risk management as AI disruption upended private equity's historically large software bets.
- • CEO Marc Rowan and CIO John Zito have publicly warned of a coming "shakeout" in the $1.8 trillion private credit industry, with Zito characterizing generic software company valuations as fundamentally "all wrong," signaling broader confidence concerns across the private credit market.
- • Apollo's stock has declined approximately 17% year-to-date, in part due to broader fears of overheating in private credit markets where Apollo maintains significant exposure, despite the firm's relative advantage in avoiding software sector pain.
Summary
Apollo Global Management has emerged relatively unscathed from the software sector downturn that has pressured many of its private equity peers, primarily through a deliberate strategy of minimizing exposure to software holdings. The firm maintained near-zero software exposure within its core private equity business and Athene balance sheet operations, insulating its portfolio from valuation deterioration and redemption pressures that have afflicted competitors with heavier software allocations.
The firm's defensive positioning became apparent through its direct lending fund adjustments in 2025, when Apollo cut software exposure by approximately half—reducing from around 20% at the start of the year. This tactical retrenchment reflects a recognition that artificial intelligence disruption has fundamentally altered the software investment thesis that previously underpinned a significant portion of private equity allocations.
Senior Apollo executives have been vocal about deteriorating conditions in the software sector and broader private credit markets. CEO Marc Rowan has warned of an impending "shakeout" within the $1.8 trillion private credit industry, while CIO John Zito has taken a more pointed stance, asserting that current valuations on generic small and mid-sized software company loans are fundamentally misaligned with economic reality. Zito's public criticism of "arrogance" in private markets suggests Apollo sees broader confidence erosion in the sector that extends beyond software-specific challenges.
Despite Apollo's relative advantage in software exposure positioning, the firm's stock has declined approximately 17% year-to-date, indicating that investor concerns about private credit market overheating and systemic stress have offset operational advantages from sector-specific avoidance. The broader market's anxiety about private credit valuations and liquidity dynamics appears to have outweighed recognition of Apollo's proactive de-risking in software, reflecting deeper questions about the sustainability of the private credit model itself.
The firm's defensive positioning became apparent through its direct lending fund adjustments in 2025, when Apollo cut software exposure by approximately half—reducing from around 20% at the start of the year. This tactical retrenchment reflects a recognition that artificial intelligence disruption has fundamentally altered the software investment thesis that previously underpinned a significant portion of private equity allocations.
Senior Apollo executives have been vocal about deteriorating conditions in the software sector and broader private credit markets. CEO Marc Rowan has warned of an impending "shakeout" within the $1.8 trillion private credit industry, while CIO John Zito has taken a more pointed stance, asserting that current valuations on generic small and mid-sized software company loans are fundamentally misaligned with economic reality. Zito's public criticism of "arrogance" in private markets suggests Apollo sees broader confidence erosion in the sector that extends beyond software-specific challenges.
Despite Apollo's relative advantage in software exposure positioning, the firm's stock has declined approximately 17% year-to-date, indicating that investor concerns about private credit market overheating and systemic stress have offset operational advantages from sector-specific avoidance. The broader market's anxiety about private credit valuations and liquidity dynamics appears to have outweighed recognition of Apollo's proactive de-risking in software, reflecting deeper questions about the sustainability of the private credit model itself.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.