Key Takeaways
- • Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's NAV per share declined 2.4% to $26.26 in Q1 2026, while BlackRock TCP Capital Corp fell 5.0% to $6.72 per share, driven by software sector stress and AI-related disruption concerns.
- • Software exposure represents a material portion of both portfolios: Blackstone allocated approximately 20% to software companies, while BlackRock TCP held roughly 27% exposure, concentrating risk in a sector facing valuation pressures.
- • Blackstone's non-accrual loans stood at just over 3% of the fund, with nearly half of quarterly markdowns concentrated in a small number of stressed positions, including software company Medallia, where the firm plans to inject additional capital for leverage reduction and AI product development.
- • BlackRock TCP reported $32.7 million in realised losses and unrealised losses tied to distressed software borrower Pluralsight and other portfolio companies, signaling specific credit events beyond broad sector headwinds.
- • Despite valuation pressure, Blackstone maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.77 per share and deployed $325 million in new investments alongside $450 million in repayments, demonstrating continued fund operations despite portfolio stress.
Summary
Blackstone and BlackRock marked down the net asset values of their flagship private credit funds during the first quarter of 2026, reflecting intensifying credit stress concentrated in the software sector and growing concerns surrounding AI-driven business model disruption. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund recorded a 2.4% decline in NAV per share to $26.26, while BlackRock TCP Capital Corp experienced a steeper 5.0% contraction to $6.72 per share. According to Reuters, both asset managers attributed the markdowns to underperformance and credit deterioration among software-related borrowers, a sector representing disproportionate exposure across their portfolios.
Software sector exposure constitutes a significant vulnerability for both firms. Blackstone disclosed that approximately 20% of its secured lending fund was allocated to software companies, while BlackRock TCP held roughly 27% exposure at quarter-end. The elevated concentration reflects the sector's historical appeal to private credit investors but has become a liability as AI-related concerns increasingly challenge traditional software business models, raising questions about earnings stability and long-term valuations. Investor scrutiny of private credit portfolios has intensified accordingly, with portfolio stress concentrated among specific troubled names.
Within Blackstone's fund, non-accrual loans—those failing to make scheduled interest payments—represented just over 3% of the portfolio. The firm highlighted ongoing restructuring efforts at Medallia, its largest troubled software exposure, where Blackstone plans to inject additional capital alongside partners to reduce leverage and fund AI-related product development initiatives. The fund reported that nearly half of its quarterly loan markdowns were concentrated in a small number of stressed positions, with remaining declines spread across the portfolio and linked partly to broader sector concerns. Despite these challenges, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.77 per share and processed $450 million in repayments alongside $325 million in new investments during the quarter.
BlackRock TCP's markdowns reflected specific credit events as well as sector-wide pressure. The fund reported $32.7 million in realised losses and additional unrealised losses tied to exposure to Pluralsight, a distressed software borrower, alongside losses at other portfolio companies. The performance highlights how private credit portfolios concentrated in software face compounding pressures from both idiosyncratic credit stress and macro concerns about AI-driven disruption to traditional software business models. Both firms' markdowns suggest that private credit investors should expect continued volatility in software-heavy portfolios absent stabilization in borrower fundamentals.
Software sector exposure constitutes a significant vulnerability for both firms. Blackstone disclosed that approximately 20% of its secured lending fund was allocated to software companies, while BlackRock TCP held roughly 27% exposure at quarter-end. The elevated concentration reflects the sector's historical appeal to private credit investors but has become a liability as AI-related concerns increasingly challenge traditional software business models, raising questions about earnings stability and long-term valuations. Investor scrutiny of private credit portfolios has intensified accordingly, with portfolio stress concentrated among specific troubled names.
Within Blackstone's fund, non-accrual loans—those failing to make scheduled interest payments—represented just over 3% of the portfolio. The firm highlighted ongoing restructuring efforts at Medallia, its largest troubled software exposure, where Blackstone plans to inject additional capital alongside partners to reduce leverage and fund AI-related product development initiatives. The fund reported that nearly half of its quarterly loan markdowns were concentrated in a small number of stressed positions, with remaining declines spread across the portfolio and linked partly to broader sector concerns. Despite these challenges, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.77 per share and processed $450 million in repayments alongside $325 million in new investments during the quarter.
BlackRock TCP's markdowns reflected specific credit events as well as sector-wide pressure. The fund reported $32.7 million in realised losses and additional unrealised losses tied to exposure to Pluralsight, a distressed software borrower, alongside losses at other portfolio companies. The performance highlights how private credit portfolios concentrated in software face compounding pressures from both idiosyncratic credit stress and macro concerns about AI-driven disruption to traditional software business models. Both firms' markdowns suggest that private credit investors should expect continued volatility in software-heavy portfolios absent stabilization in borrower fundamentals.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.