Key Takeaways
- • Climate activists staged a protest outside the Museum of Modern Art's major fundraising gala on June 8, 2023, targeting Henry Kravis, co-founder and co-executive chairman of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR), the fourth-largest private equity firm in the U.S., over the firm's fossil fuel investments.
- • Marie-Josée Kravis, Henry Kravis's wife and current chair of MoMA's board, has direct institutional ties to the museum, including a gallery bearing the Kravis name, creating a high-profile nexus between a major cultural institution and a PE firm with significant hydrocarbon exposure.
- • The protest reflects broader institutional pressure on museums and cultural organizations to divest from donors whose wealth derives from fossil fuel industry involvement, positioning ESG compliance and reputational risk as material considerations for board governance at major nonprofits.
- • Approximately 15 protesters from Climate Organizing Hub, New York Communities for Change, and Reclaim Our Tomorrow organized the demonstration, which coincided with hazardous air quality events in New York City driven by Canadian wildfires—creating a visual and messaging connection between fossil fuel investment and environmental harm.
- • The timing underscores escalating activist pressure on philanthropic capital flows and institutional gatekeeping, with climate groups leveraging high-profile cultural events to challenge the legitimacy of fossil fuel-derived donations.
Summary
Climate activists staged a focused protest outside the Museum of Modern Art's primary fundraising gala on the evening of June 8, 2023, demanding the institution sever ties with Henry Kravis and his firm, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR). Kravis, co-founder and co-executive chairman of the fourth-largest private equity firm in the United States, has been targeted by activist groups due to KKR's capital deployment into fossil fuel projects. The timing carries particular institutional significance: Marie-Josée Kravis, Henry's wife, serves as chair of MoMA's board, and the couple has endowed a gallery within the museum, creating a direct intersection between cultural governance and private equity capital sourcing.
The protest, organized by three community groups—Climate Organizing Hub, New York Communities for Change, and Reclaim Our Tomorrow—drew approximately 15 demonstrators. Jonathan Westin, executive director of the Climate Organizing Hub, connected the protest messaging to immediate environmental conditions, noting that Canadian wildfires had created dangerous air quality in New York City and stating: "This smoke that's in the air is coming from wildfires in Canada that is happening because fossil fuel profiteers like Henry Kravis are pouring billions of dollars into fossil fuels." The protest coincided with a period when New York City's air quality ranked worst among major global cities, amplifying the activist narrative around environmental causation.
This action reflects a widening institutional challenge to philanthropic capital derived from the fossil fuel industry. Museums and cultural organizations face mounting pressure to refuse donations and board positions linked to extractive energy investments, positioning ESG compliance and reputational risk as material governance considerations. The protest fits a broader pattern of activist campaigns targeting cultural institutions' donor relationships, signaling that major nonprofits now face stakeholder scrutiny regarding the origins and implications of their funding sources. For institutional investors and alternative asset managers, this demonstrates evolving reputational and regulatory dynamics surrounding private equity firm governance and environmental positioning, particularly for firms with significant fossil fuel exposure.
The protest, organized by three community groups—Climate Organizing Hub, New York Communities for Change, and Reclaim Our Tomorrow—drew approximately 15 demonstrators. Jonathan Westin, executive director of the Climate Organizing Hub, connected the protest messaging to immediate environmental conditions, noting that Canadian wildfires had created dangerous air quality in New York City and stating: "This smoke that's in the air is coming from wildfires in Canada that is happening because fossil fuel profiteers like Henry Kravis are pouring billions of dollars into fossil fuels." The protest coincided with a period when New York City's air quality ranked worst among major global cities, amplifying the activist narrative around environmental causation.
This action reflects a widening institutional challenge to philanthropic capital derived from the fossil fuel industry. Museums and cultural organizations face mounting pressure to refuse donations and board positions linked to extractive energy investments, positioning ESG compliance and reputational risk as material governance considerations. The protest fits a broader pattern of activist campaigns targeting cultural institutions' donor relationships, signaling that major nonprofits now face stakeholder scrutiny regarding the origins and implications of their funding sources. For institutional investors and alternative asset managers, this demonstrates evolving reputational and regulatory dynamics surrounding private equity firm governance and environmental positioning, particularly for firms with significant fossil fuel exposure.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.