Key Takeaways
- • Co-investments have emerged as a central strategy for public pension funds seeking to enhance net returns while reducing fee drag, with documented billions in cumulative savings across major institutional allocators.
- • Northern Trust Asset Management will convert six mutual funds totaling $33 billion into ETFs, more than doubling its ETF assets under management to approximately $60 billion—the largest single-manager conversion since Dimensional Fund Advisors' 2021 transition.
- • Co-investment structures enable pension funds to retain a greater share of underlying investment returns compared to traditional fund-of-funds models, with lower fee structures directly improving net outcomes without meaningfully increasing risk exposure.
- • Major public pension plans including CalPERS and PSERS have successfully scaled co-investment programs as a portfolio diversification tool, with CF Private Equity reporting a 38 percent increase in co-investment opportunities reviewed between 2022 and 2023.
- • Co-investments provide institutional investors greater transparency, control, and portfolio construction flexibility by allowing direct minority stakes alongside primary fund managers, addressing the challenge of fee compression in traditional private equity vehicles.
Summary
Co-investments have solidified their position as a core component of private equity strategy for institutional investors, particularly public pension funds seeking to optimize net returns in an environment of persistent fee pressure. The strategy involves taking direct minority stakes alongside private equity or venture capital fund sponsors, allowing pension allocators to bypass traditional fund-of-funds fee structures that can significantly erode performance over time.
The financial benefits are material. Pension systems including the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the Pennsylvania School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS) have documented substantial fee savings by incorporating co-investments into diversified private equity programs. According to institutional research, co-investments typically carry lower fee burdens compared to traditional pooled vehicles, enabling investors to retain more of the underlying investment return. This structural advantage translates directly to enhanced net outcomes without requiring meaningful increases in portfolio risk or complexity.
Beyond cost savings, co-investments address portfolio control and transparency concerns. Institutional allocators gain greater visibility into underlying portfolio companies and retain decision-making authority over individual investments, rather than ceding full discretion to fund managers. This represents a meaningful shift in how pension funds architect their alternatives portfolios, moving from passive capital commitments toward active participation in deal selection and construction.
Market activity confirms the strategy's momentum. CF Private Equity documented a 38 percent increase in co-investment opportunities reviewed between 2022 and 2023, indicating sustained supply-side growth. Separately, Northern Trust Asset Management announced plans to convert six mutual funds totaling $33 billion into exchange-traded fund vehicles, expanding its ETF platform to approximately $60 billion in assets—the largest single-manager conversion since Dimensional Fund Advisors executed a comparable transition in 2021. This structural shift toward ETF wrappers reflects broader institutional demand for greater liquidity and transparency in alternative asset vehicles.
For pension funds navigating constrained return environments, co-investments represent a pragmatic mechanism to enhance net performance through fee reduction while maintaining diversified exposure to private capital markets. The strategy's expansion underscores a fundamental rebalancing of power dynamics between institutional capital and fund managers, with larger allocators increasingly willing to deploy capital directly when fee economics justify the operational overhead.
The financial benefits are material. Pension systems including the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the Pennsylvania School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS) have documented substantial fee savings by incorporating co-investments into diversified private equity programs. According to institutional research, co-investments typically carry lower fee burdens compared to traditional pooled vehicles, enabling investors to retain more of the underlying investment return. This structural advantage translates directly to enhanced net outcomes without requiring meaningful increases in portfolio risk or complexity.
Beyond cost savings, co-investments address portfolio control and transparency concerns. Institutional allocators gain greater visibility into underlying portfolio companies and retain decision-making authority over individual investments, rather than ceding full discretion to fund managers. This represents a meaningful shift in how pension funds architect their alternatives portfolios, moving from passive capital commitments toward active participation in deal selection and construction.
Market activity confirms the strategy's momentum. CF Private Equity documented a 38 percent increase in co-investment opportunities reviewed between 2022 and 2023, indicating sustained supply-side growth. Separately, Northern Trust Asset Management announced plans to convert six mutual funds totaling $33 billion into exchange-traded fund vehicles, expanding its ETF platform to approximately $60 billion in assets—the largest single-manager conversion since Dimensional Fund Advisors executed a comparable transition in 2021. This structural shift toward ETF wrappers reflects broader institutional demand for greater liquidity and transparency in alternative asset vehicles.
For pension funds navigating constrained return environments, co-investments represent a pragmatic mechanism to enhance net performance through fee reduction while maintaining diversified exposure to private capital markets. The strategy's expansion underscores a fundamental rebalancing of power dynamics between institutional capital and fund managers, with larger allocators increasingly willing to deploy capital directly when fee economics justify the operational overhead.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.