Key Takeaways
- • CPPIB drawing a hard line on co-investment fee structure: The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, managing $777.5 billion in assets with 29% allocated to private equity, will reduce or terminate partnerships with PE firms that attempt to charge fees on co-investments, according to CEO John Graham.
- • Institutional investors treating fee changes as a dealbreaker: Large institutional investors view the traditional no-fee, no-carry co-investment model as non-negotiable and are prepared to reallocate capital away from PE firms that shift this structure, signaling potential capital flight from the sector.
- • EQT and other managers testing fee tolerance: Private equity firms, including EQT, are exploring co-investment fees as a new revenue stream amid competitive pressures, but face institutional investor resistance that could materially impact allocations and deal flow.
- • Retail capital influx threatening traditional institutional dynamics: The emergence of wealth channels and retail capital competing for allocation in private equity marquee deals is creating pressure on PE managers to monetize co-investment opportunities, but large institutions are prepared to defend their historical cost structure.
- • Performance headwinds compounding negotiating power: Institutional investors are already becoming more selective about PE allocations following recent asset class underperformance, giving them additional leverage to resist fee increases and potentially shrink deal allocations.
Summary
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board has explicitly rejected any shift toward fee-based co-investment structures in private equity, positioning institutional investor resistance as a potential constraint on alternative asset managers' revenue expansion strategies. CPPIB CEO John Graham stated unambiguously that the organization will curtail or terminate relationships with PE firms that attempt to charge fees for co-investments, describing such moves as incompatible with the pension fund's operating model.
The dispute centers on a decades-old convention wherein large institutional investors and buyout firms jointly invested in marquee transactions on a no-fee, no-carry basis. This arrangement has historically benefited both parties: institutions gained access to premium deals without additional cost layers, while PE firms retained full carry on their capital and management fees from the primary fund. Private equity managers, including EQT, are now testing whether they can monetize co-investment opportunities—a tempting avenue given competitive pressures and the influx of retail wealth channels seeking allocation in large private equity deals.
CPPIB, which held $777.5 billion in net assets as of September 2025 with approximately 29% of its portfolio in private equities, possesses significant negotiating leverage. Graham characterized institutional investors as "economic animals" who will mechanically reallocate capital if fee economics shift unfavorably. The pension fund's size and deal flow participation make it a critical capital source for large PE transactions, amplifying the credibility of its stated willingness to exit partnerships.
The institutional resistance emerges against a backdrop of already-waning PE performance, which has prompted large investors to become more selective about capital deployment in the asset class. Simultaneously, institutions are concerned about deal allocation compression as wealthy individuals and retail capital channels compete for slots in high-quality transactions. Any fee introduction by PE managers risks accelerating institutional pullback during a period when the sector can least afford capital retrenchment.
The outcome of this dynamic will likely determine whether private equity can successfully implement new fee structures or whether institutional investor discipline forces managers to preserve traditional arrangements to retain access to the largest and most stable capital sources.
The dispute centers on a decades-old convention wherein large institutional investors and buyout firms jointly invested in marquee transactions on a no-fee, no-carry basis. This arrangement has historically benefited both parties: institutions gained access to premium deals without additional cost layers, while PE firms retained full carry on their capital and management fees from the primary fund. Private equity managers, including EQT, are now testing whether they can monetize co-investment opportunities—a tempting avenue given competitive pressures and the influx of retail wealth channels seeking allocation in large private equity deals.
CPPIB, which held $777.5 billion in net assets as of September 2025 with approximately 29% of its portfolio in private equities, possesses significant negotiating leverage. Graham characterized institutional investors as "economic animals" who will mechanically reallocate capital if fee economics shift unfavorably. The pension fund's size and deal flow participation make it a critical capital source for large PE transactions, amplifying the credibility of its stated willingness to exit partnerships.
The institutional resistance emerges against a backdrop of already-waning PE performance, which has prompted large investors to become more selective about capital deployment in the asset class. Simultaneously, institutions are concerned about deal allocation compression as wealthy individuals and retail capital channels compete for slots in high-quality transactions. Any fee introduction by PE managers risks accelerating institutional pullback during a period when the sector can least afford capital retrenchment.
The outcome of this dynamic will likely determine whether private equity can successfully implement new fee structures or whether institutional investor discipline forces managers to preserve traditional arrangements to retain access to the largest and most stable capital sources.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.
