Key Takeaways
- • Family offices increased direct investment value by 123.3% year-over-year to nearly $13 billion, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence data cited in the report, signaling a sharp acceleration in capital deployment outside traditional PE fund structures.
- • Approximately 70% of family offices now engage in direct investments, with 40% increasing activity over the past year, driven by demand for lower fees, greater control, and customized investment strategies that bypass fund management constraints.
- • Technology, media, and telecom transactions dominated sector allocation, with family offices deploying over $3 billion across 36 deals in this sector, including an $860 million investment in aerospace start-up Stoke Space Technologies.
- • Family offices cite "patient capital" advantages—the ability to hold assets for extended periods without forced exit timelines—alongside flexibility in portfolio construction, sector exclusions, and liquidity preferences as primary motivations for direct deal engagement.
- • The shift reflects structural pressure on traditional private equity fee models, with leading wealth advisers including Citi Wealth and Northern Trust increasingly supporting bilateral and co-investment structures for their ultra-high-net-worth clients.
Summary
Private wealth investors are systematically redirecting capital away from traditional private equity fund structures toward direct investments in private companies, creating a material challenge to conventional PE fee models. S&P Global Market Intelligence data shows family offices increased direct investment value by 123.3% last year to approximately $13 billion, reflecting an accelerating trend among ultra-wealthy investors seeking greater control and cost efficiency.
According to a Citi Wealth survey, 70% of family offices now participate in direct investments, with 40% expanding their activity during the past year. This shift indicates a fundamental realignment in capital allocation preferences. Family offices cite multiple strategic advantages: the ability to deploy "patient capital" without conforming to fund-imposed exit timelines, reduced fee drag compared to traditional fund structures, and enhanced portfolio customization around specific sector exclusions, liquidity requirements, and public market exposure constraints.
Technology and growth-oriented sectors dominate deployment patterns. Family offices invested more than $3 billion across 36 technology, media, and telecom transactions last year—the highest concentration among tracked sectors. The largest single transaction was an $860 million investment in Stoke Space Technologies, a US-based aerospace company founded by former employees of Blue Origin and SpaceX. Materials sector investments also attracted significant family office capital, reflecting a broader strategic tilt toward innovation and high-growth assets.
Northern Trust and Citi Wealth, major advisers to global family office clients, have increasingly shifted their recommendation posture toward co-investments and bilateral deal structures rather than committing clients exclusively to fund vehicles. This reflects advisor recognition that ultra-wealthy clients now possess sufficient scale and sophistication to manage direct exposure effectively while capturing the economic benefits of reduced intermediation.
The trend poses structural headwinds for traditional PE fund economics, where management fees and carry compensation depend on committed capital flowing through fund vehicles. As family offices accumulate deal experience and infrastructure capabilities, the competitive positioning of GP-led fund structures becomes increasingly pressured, particularly for strategies targeting patient capital and customized risk-return profiles that do not align with standardized fund timelines and fee arrangements.
According to a Citi Wealth survey, 70% of family offices now participate in direct investments, with 40% expanding their activity during the past year. This shift indicates a fundamental realignment in capital allocation preferences. Family offices cite multiple strategic advantages: the ability to deploy "patient capital" without conforming to fund-imposed exit timelines, reduced fee drag compared to traditional fund structures, and enhanced portfolio customization around specific sector exclusions, liquidity requirements, and public market exposure constraints.
Technology and growth-oriented sectors dominate deployment patterns. Family offices invested more than $3 billion across 36 technology, media, and telecom transactions last year—the highest concentration among tracked sectors. The largest single transaction was an $860 million investment in Stoke Space Technologies, a US-based aerospace company founded by former employees of Blue Origin and SpaceX. Materials sector investments also attracted significant family office capital, reflecting a broader strategic tilt toward innovation and high-growth assets.
Northern Trust and Citi Wealth, major advisers to global family office clients, have increasingly shifted their recommendation posture toward co-investments and bilateral deal structures rather than committing clients exclusively to fund vehicles. This reflects advisor recognition that ultra-wealthy clients now possess sufficient scale and sophistication to manage direct exposure effectively while capturing the economic benefits of reduced intermediation.
The trend poses structural headwinds for traditional PE fund economics, where management fees and carry compensation depend on committed capital flowing through fund vehicles. As family offices accumulate deal experience and infrastructure capabilities, the competitive positioning of GP-led fund structures becomes increasingly pressured, particularly for strategies targeting patient capital and customized risk-return profiles that do not align with standardized fund timelines and fee arrangements.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.