Key Takeaways
- • The FCA is developing a comprehensive metrics framework to assess leverage-related risks across non-bank financial intermediaries (NBFIs), including hedge funds, private equity firms, and other alternative asset managers, with implications for systemic risk management across UK markets.
- • Recent market dislocations—including the March 2020 Treasury market "dash for cash," the autumn 2022 LDI pension fund crisis, and the March 2021 Archegos Capital Management collapse—have demonstrated that concentrated or crowded NBFI leverage can amplify market stress and generate systemic spillovers to regulated financial institutions.
- • The FCA has outlined a three-line-of-defence framework: NBFI entities themselves must manage investment risks; counterparty banks must enforce appropriate lending standards and monitoring; and regulators must maintain oversight and implement targeted measures to contain leverage where financial stability risks materialize.
- • The FCA's approach extends parts of its Code of Conduct to non-bank financial firms and clarifies fitness and propriety expectations, aligning with broader Financial Stability Board consultation efforts to address vulnerabilities in non-bank financial intermediation leverage.
Summary
On 25 February 2025, Sarah Pritchard, executive director of consumers, competition, and international at the UK Financial Conduct Authority, delivered remarks at the Investment Association Roundtable outlining the FCA's regulatory approach to managing systemic risk associated with leverage in non-bank financial intermediation. The speech reflects intensifying regulatory focus on NBFI leverage following a series of market stress events that demonstrated how concentrated positions and unwinding can propagate losses across counterparties and asset classes.
The FCA cited three critical historical episodes to justify its regulatory framework. The March 2020 "dash for cash" saw hedge funds rapidly unwind highly leveraged U.S. Treasury positions, disrupting core fixed-income markets. In autumn 2022, a surge in long-dated yields generated substantial margin calls on UK pension funds' liability-driven investment strategies, creating forced selling pressures. Most significantly, the March 2021 collapse of Archegos Capital Management resulted in material losses for multiple bank counterparties despite regulatory safeguards, exposing the interconnectedness of NBFI leverage and regulated financial institutions.
The FCA's risk mitigation framework operates across three defensive layers. The first line of defence rests with NBFI entities themselves, which must implement robust investment risk management practices. The second layer involves counterparty banks, which must enforce appropriate lending standards, conduct stress testing, and maintain active monitoring of leveraged positions. The third line comprises regulatory intervention, where authorities implement targeted measures to contain NBFI leverage in markets, entities, and activities where it poses material financial stability risks.
To operationalize this approach, the FCA is developing a range of quantitative metrics to assess leverage-related vulnerabilities and clarifying expectations for fitness and propriety standards among non-bank financial firms. This work aligns with broader international efforts, including ongoing Financial Stability Board consultations on recommendations to address financial stability implications of leverage in non-bank financial intermediation. The FCA's stance recognizes that while NBFI entities play a vital role in global capital markets, highly concentrated or crowded leverage can amplify market volatility and generate systemic outcomes extending beyond individual fund failures to affect market liquidity and counterparty resilience.
The FCA cited three critical historical episodes to justify its regulatory framework. The March 2020 "dash for cash" saw hedge funds rapidly unwind highly leveraged U.S. Treasury positions, disrupting core fixed-income markets. In autumn 2022, a surge in long-dated yields generated substantial margin calls on UK pension funds' liability-driven investment strategies, creating forced selling pressures. Most significantly, the March 2021 collapse of Archegos Capital Management resulted in material losses for multiple bank counterparties despite regulatory safeguards, exposing the interconnectedness of NBFI leverage and regulated financial institutions.
The FCA's risk mitigation framework operates across three defensive layers. The first line of defence rests with NBFI entities themselves, which must implement robust investment risk management practices. The second layer involves counterparty banks, which must enforce appropriate lending standards, conduct stress testing, and maintain active monitoring of leveraged positions. The third line comprises regulatory intervention, where authorities implement targeted measures to contain NBFI leverage in markets, entities, and activities where it poses material financial stability risks.
To operationalize this approach, the FCA is developing a range of quantitative metrics to assess leverage-related vulnerabilities and clarifying expectations for fitness and propriety standards among non-bank financial firms. This work aligns with broader international efforts, including ongoing Financial Stability Board consultations on recommendations to address financial stability implications of leverage in non-bank financial intermediation. The FCA's stance recognizes that while NBFI entities play a vital role in global capital markets, highly concentrated or crowded leverage can amplify market volatility and generate systemic outcomes extending beyond individual fund failures to affect market liquidity and counterparty resilience.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.