Key Takeaways
- • Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $15 million to settle CFTC charges that it failed to disclose pre-trade mid-market marks (PTMMM) on swaps executed in 2015 and 2016, violating Business Conduct Standards for swap dealers.
- • Goldman deliberately targeted less sophisticated swap market clients, employing a strategy where it quoted both same-day and next-day swap prices but selectively withheld PTMMM disclosures that would have revealed more favorable pricing alternatives to buyers.
- • Internal communications revealed that Goldman personnel believed reduced client understanding of same-day swap economics directly correlated to higher profit extraction, demonstrating intentional obfuscation of pricing transparency.
- • In same-day swap transactions, Goldman positioned itself to go long equity indices at below-market levels or short at above-market levels when clients lacked full pricing disclosure, creating asymmetric information advantages.
- • The CFTC enforcement action underscores regulatory commitment to policing transparency violations in the over-the-counter swaps market, with the regulator stating it will "aggressively pursue swap dealers" violating business conduct standards.
Summary
Goldman Sachs has agreed to pay $15 million to settle Commodity Futures Trading Commission charges that it systematically failed to disclose pricing data on swap transactions during 2015 and 2016. The settlement addresses violations of CFTC Business Conduct Standards governing swap dealer transparency and fair dealing practices.
The regulatory action centers on Goldman's practice of quoting clients two distinct swap prices—one based on the same day's equity index price and another based on the following day's price. According to CFTC findings, when Goldman knew that same-day swaps could be immediately profitable for the bank, it frequently withheld pre-trade mid-market marks (PTMMM) from disclosure. This selective non-disclosure prevented clients from understanding that more favorable pricing alternatives existed, allowing Goldman to initiate transactions with buyers already positioned at a disadvantage.
The enforcement order includes damaging internal communications indicating deliberate strategy. CFTC findings state that "Goldman personnel believed that the less the clients understood about the economics of the same-day swaps, the more profit Goldman could make." This characterization establishes that opacity was not incidental but central to Goldman's profit model on these transactions. The bank explicitly targeted clients with limited swap market expertise, compounding the information asymmetry created by selective disclosure practices.
Through these transactions, Goldman positioned itself advantageously: going long equity indices at below-market execution levels or shorting at above-market levels when clients lacked complete pricing information. While Goldman admitted to failing to properly disclose PTMMM on same-day swaps, it neither admitted nor denied other allegations in the settlement.
CFTC Enforcement Director Ian P. McGinley stated that the penalty demonstrates the regulator's commitment to pursuing violations of Business Conduct Standards, emphasizing that transparent and fair swap market practices remain a regulatory priority.
The regulatory action centers on Goldman's practice of quoting clients two distinct swap prices—one based on the same day's equity index price and another based on the following day's price. According to CFTC findings, when Goldman knew that same-day swaps could be immediately profitable for the bank, it frequently withheld pre-trade mid-market marks (PTMMM) from disclosure. This selective non-disclosure prevented clients from understanding that more favorable pricing alternatives existed, allowing Goldman to initiate transactions with buyers already positioned at a disadvantage.
The enforcement order includes damaging internal communications indicating deliberate strategy. CFTC findings state that "Goldman personnel believed that the less the clients understood about the economics of the same-day swaps, the more profit Goldman could make." This characterization establishes that opacity was not incidental but central to Goldman's profit model on these transactions. The bank explicitly targeted clients with limited swap market expertise, compounding the information asymmetry created by selective disclosure practices.
Through these transactions, Goldman positioned itself advantageously: going long equity indices at below-market execution levels or shorting at above-market levels when clients lacked complete pricing information. While Goldman admitted to failing to properly disclose PTMMM on same-day swaps, it neither admitted nor denied other allegations in the settlement.
CFTC Enforcement Director Ian P. McGinley stated that the penalty demonstrates the regulator's commitment to pursuing violations of Business Conduct Standards, emphasizing that transparent and fair swap market practices remain a regulatory priority.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.