Key Takeaways
- • A Health Affairs study examining hospice acquisitions between 2010 and 2021 documents statistically significant declines in care intensity following private equity and publicly traded company acquisitions, with registered nurse minutes per 30 days falling 5.14% post-PE acquisition and 4.63% post-PTC acquisition.
- • Social worker visit minutes declined 12.32% after PE acquisitions, while home hospice aide minutes decreased 6.62% post-PE and 9.09% post-PTC, with declines also observed during the critical final seven days of patient life.
- • Large-scale PE and PTC acquirers drove the majority of care intensity reductions, with two of the largest PE acquirers and two of the largest PTC acquirers in the United States responsible for the most pronounced decreases in nursing and aide visit minutes.
- • Study authors recommend enhanced transparency requirements, including consumer-facing disclosure of hospice ownership and organizational scale, strengthened post-acquisition oversight mechanisms, and payment reforms that tie reimbursement directly to care intensity and quality metrics to address the documented care declines.
Summary
A new study published in Health Affairs provides empirical evidence that private equity and publicly traded company acquisitions of hospice providers are associated with meaningful reductions in care delivery intensity. Researchers linked a national database of PE and PTC acquisitions occurring between 2010 and 2021 to Medicare claims data, revealing quantifiable declines across multiple care categories.
The magnitude of these declines is clinically relevant. Following PE acquisition, registered nurse minutes per 30-day period fell by 5.14%, social worker minutes by 12.32%, and home hospice aide minutes by 6.62%. Publicly traded company acquisitions produced somewhat smaller but still significant decreases: RN minutes declined 4.63% and home hospice aide minutes dropped 9.09%. Notably, these visit reductions persisted during the final seven days of life, a period when care intensity typically becomes most critical for patient comfort and family support.
The study identifies concentrated market impact, with two of the largest PE acquirers and two of the largest PTC acquirers in the United States accounting for the most substantial decreases in visit minutes across nursing, social work, and aide categories. This concentration suggests that scale-driven cost optimization strategies employed by major operators may be a primary driver of care intensity reductions.
The authors emphasize that while PE and PTC acquisitions produced predominantly negative impacts on care intensity, the findings were not uniformly negative across all metrics. They call for policy interventions including consumer-facing disclosure requirements that would enable patients and families to identify hospice ownership structures, enhanced Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) post-acquisition oversight protocols, and payment model reforms designed to align reimbursement rates with demonstrated care intensity and quality outcomes rather than pure cost minimization. These recommendations reflect growing regulatory concern about the compatibility of PE ownership models with the labor-intensive, quality-dependent nature of end-of-life care delivery.
The magnitude of these declines is clinically relevant. Following PE acquisition, registered nurse minutes per 30-day period fell by 5.14%, social worker minutes by 12.32%, and home hospice aide minutes by 6.62%. Publicly traded company acquisitions produced somewhat smaller but still significant decreases: RN minutes declined 4.63% and home hospice aide minutes dropped 9.09%. Notably, these visit reductions persisted during the final seven days of life, a period when care intensity typically becomes most critical for patient comfort and family support.
The study identifies concentrated market impact, with two of the largest PE acquirers and two of the largest PTC acquirers in the United States accounting for the most substantial decreases in visit minutes across nursing, social work, and aide categories. This concentration suggests that scale-driven cost optimization strategies employed by major operators may be a primary driver of care intensity reductions.
The authors emphasize that while PE and PTC acquisitions produced predominantly negative impacts on care intensity, the findings were not uniformly negative across all metrics. They call for policy interventions including consumer-facing disclosure requirements that would enable patients and families to identify hospice ownership structures, enhanced Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) post-acquisition oversight protocols, and payment model reforms designed to align reimbursement rates with demonstrated care intensity and quality outcomes rather than pure cost minimization. These recommendations reflect growing regulatory concern about the compatibility of PE ownership models with the labor-intensive, quality-dependent nature of end-of-life care delivery.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.