Key Takeaways
- • James Carthew, head of investment trust analysis at QuotedData, positions investment trusts as "buy and forget" vehicles with built-in governance safeguards, noting that boards should intervene—whether prompted by activist investors or independently—to address performance issues such as manager changes.
- • Carthew expresses cautious optimism on private equity investment trusts despite recent tariff-driven market volatility, arguing that PE funds are likely to "fare much better than many expect" over the medium to long term.
- • Carthew favors managers with direct control over underlying investments, specifically citing Oakley Capital and HgCapital as preferred structures, suggesting that operational oversight reduces downside risk in PE portfolios.
- • The private equity sector faces a prolonged assessment period following software sector sell-offs; Carthew notes "the jury will be out for a long while yet" on whether strong portfolio exits and performance will offset recent headwinds.
- • Growth capital funds have historically been launchable only during periods of investor exuberance, creating structural challenges for fund managers seeking to deploy capital in less favorable market environments.
Summary
James Carthew, head of investment trust analysis at QuotedData, offered nuanced commentary on the investment trust landscape and private equity sector in Investors' Chronicle, addressing both structural governance advantages and current market challenges facing PE-focused trusts.
Carthew frames investment trusts as inherently defensive investment vehicles from a governance perspective. In theory, he argues, trusts function as "buy and forget" investments with embedded protections: if performance deteriorates, the board—whether prompted by activist shareholders or acting independently—retains the authority to intervene through manager replacement or strategic repositioning. This governance framework distinguishes trusts from other collective investment structures and provides investors with recourse beyond liquidation or redemption.
Despite pronounced headwinds from tariff-driven market volatility and recent software sector underperformance, Carthew maintains a constructive long-term outlook on private equity investment trusts. He cautions, however, that comprehensive assessment of PE fund resilience will take considerable time; "the jury will be out for a long while yet" on whether strong portfolio exits and underlying company performance will ultimately offset near-term mark-to-market losses. This measured stance reflects recognition that PE returns are inherently backward-looking and that current valuations may not reflect underlying business fundamentals.
Carthew identifies manager selection as a critical alpha driver, favoring PE firms that exercise direct operational control over portfolio companies. Oakley Capital and HgCapital receive specific endorsement on this basis, with the implication that hands-on management reduces portfolio volatility and enhances value creation relative to more passive or broad-based PE vehicles.
Carthew also notes a structural constraint in the PE fundraising cycle: growth capital funds have historically been launchable only during periods of investor exuberance, creating cyclical limitations on capital deployment and manager dry powder during market dislocations.
Carthew frames investment trusts as inherently defensive investment vehicles from a governance perspective. In theory, he argues, trusts function as "buy and forget" investments with embedded protections: if performance deteriorates, the board—whether prompted by activist shareholders or acting independently—retains the authority to intervene through manager replacement or strategic repositioning. This governance framework distinguishes trusts from other collective investment structures and provides investors with recourse beyond liquidation or redemption.
Despite pronounced headwinds from tariff-driven market volatility and recent software sector underperformance, Carthew maintains a constructive long-term outlook on private equity investment trusts. He cautions, however, that comprehensive assessment of PE fund resilience will take considerable time; "the jury will be out for a long while yet" on whether strong portfolio exits and underlying company performance will ultimately offset near-term mark-to-market losses. This measured stance reflects recognition that PE returns are inherently backward-looking and that current valuations may not reflect underlying business fundamentals.
Carthew identifies manager selection as a critical alpha driver, favoring PE firms that exercise direct operational control over portfolio companies. Oakley Capital and HgCapital receive specific endorsement on this basis, with the implication that hands-on management reduces portfolio volatility and enhances value creation relative to more passive or broad-based PE vehicles.
Carthew also notes a structural constraint in the PE fundraising cycle: growth capital funds have historically been launchable only during periods of investor exuberance, creating cyclical limitations on capital deployment and manager dry powder during market dislocations.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.