Key Takeaways
- • At least 568 healthcare facilities operate through nonprofit-private equity joint ventures, a figure likely understated due to reliance on public data sources, according to a Private Equity Stakeholder Project (PESP) report.
- • More than one-fifth of private equity–owned hospitals operate under joint venture arrangements with nonprofit health systems, with Apollo Global Management–owned Lifepoint Health running nearly two-thirds of its hospitals through such structures.
- • Joint ventures span multiple healthcare subsectors including inpatient rehabilitation, hospice, home health, behavioral health, ambulatory surgery centers, and urgent care, creating complex ownership structures that current regulations have not adequately addressed.
- • PE-backed joint ventures enable companies to expand into new markets, circumvent regulatory restrictions on non-physician ownership of medical practices, avoid nonprofit-to-for-profit conversion challenges, and access private capital while extracting value through real estate sales.
- • PESP warns that while joint ventures may benefit participating businesses, PE-backed arrangements carry the same financial and operational risks associated with traditional private equity healthcare buyouts, warranting increased regulatory scrutiny and disclosure requirements.
Summary
The Private Equity Stakeholder Project released a report documenting at least 568 healthcare facilities operating through nonprofit-private equity joint ventures, raising questions about regulatory oversight of increasingly complex healthcare ownership structures. The reported figure represents a conservative count based solely on publicly available data, suggesting the actual number of such arrangements is substantially higher.
Joint venture structures have become a prevalent feature of PE-backed healthcare consolidation. More than one-fifth of PE-owned hospitals operate through joint ventures with nonprofit health systems, according to the report. Apollo Global Management–owned Lifepoint Health exemplifies this trend, with nearly two-thirds of its hospital portfolio organized as joint ventures. These arrangements extend well beyond traditional hospital ownership, encompassing inpatient rehabilitation facilities, hospice providers, home health services, behavioral health operations, ambulatory surgery centers, and urgent care clinics.
The PESP report identified multiple strategic motivations driving PE adoption of joint venture structures. Joint ventures facilitate market expansion by leveraging existing nonprofit health system networks and patient bases. They also circumvent regulatory barriers—particularly state-level restrictions prohibiting non-physicians from owning medical practices. Joint ventures further allow PE investors to avoid the operational and reputational challenges associated with converting a nonprofit health system to for-profit status. Additionally, these structures provide access to private capital and enable revenue generation through real estate sales, a practice that has contributed to high-profile health system bankruptcies in recent years.
Despite these strategic advantages, the PESP report emphasizes that PE-backed joint ventures carry inherent risks similar to traditional private equity healthcare acquisitions. The report states: "While joint ventures may be advantageous configurations for the businesses involved, PE-backed joint ventures may still represent the risks associated with PE buyouts in healthcare." Current regulatory frameworks have not evolved sufficiently to address the complexities and potential pitfalls of these hybrid ownership models, underscoring the need for enhanced disclosure requirements and regulatory scrutiny.
Joint venture structures have become a prevalent feature of PE-backed healthcare consolidation. More than one-fifth of PE-owned hospitals operate through joint ventures with nonprofit health systems, according to the report. Apollo Global Management–owned Lifepoint Health exemplifies this trend, with nearly two-thirds of its hospital portfolio organized as joint ventures. These arrangements extend well beyond traditional hospital ownership, encompassing inpatient rehabilitation facilities, hospice providers, home health services, behavioral health operations, ambulatory surgery centers, and urgent care clinics.
The PESP report identified multiple strategic motivations driving PE adoption of joint venture structures. Joint ventures facilitate market expansion by leveraging existing nonprofit health system networks and patient bases. They also circumvent regulatory barriers—particularly state-level restrictions prohibiting non-physicians from owning medical practices. Joint ventures further allow PE investors to avoid the operational and reputational challenges associated with converting a nonprofit health system to for-profit status. Additionally, these structures provide access to private capital and enable revenue generation through real estate sales, a practice that has contributed to high-profile health system bankruptcies in recent years.
Despite these strategic advantages, the PESP report emphasizes that PE-backed joint ventures carry inherent risks similar to traditional private equity healthcare acquisitions. The report states: "While joint ventures may be advantageous configurations for the businesses involved, PE-backed joint ventures may still represent the risks associated with PE buyouts in healthcare." Current regulatory frameworks have not evolved sufficiently to address the complexities and potential pitfalls of these hybrid ownership models, underscoring the need for enhanced disclosure requirements and regulatory scrutiny.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.