Key Takeaways
- • New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is proposing to reduce the pass-through entity tax (PTET) credit from 100% to 75%, targeting hedge funds, private equity firms, and other high-income business partnerships to address a projected $5.4 billion two-year municipal budget deficit.
- • The proposal could generate approximately $1 billion in additional revenue for the city, according to city officials, by reducing the state and local tax deduction offset that was originally designed to mitigate the 2017 federal tax reform impact.
- • Governor Kathy Hochul has signaled opposition to the plan, characterizing it as a personal income tax increase and indicating resistance to state-level approval, which is required for implementation.
- • The change would primarily affect pass-through business owners in finance, legal services, healthcare, and retail sectors while exempting large corporations, though critics warn that aggressive credit reduction could discourage participation in the optional tax system and limit revenue gains.
- • Massachusetts and Connecticut have already implemented partial PTET credit systems, providing precedent for New York's proposed adjustment and suggesting the state could move closer to regional alignment on this tax structure.
Summary
New York City is moving to narrow a significant tax benefit for investment partnerships and other high-income business structures as municipal budget pressures intensify. Mayor Zohran Mamdani, working alongside City Council Speaker Julie Menin, has proposed reducing the pass-through entity tax credit from its current 100% level to 75%. The PTET is a mechanism that allows certain business owners—particularly those in hedge funds, private equity, and other financial services—to offset federal limitations on state and local tax deductions by receiving a full credit for taxes paid to the city and state.
The credit was originally established to mitigate the effects of the 2017 federal tax overhaul, which capped state and local tax deductions at $10,000 nationally. City officials estimate that reducing the credit to 75% could generate close to $1 billion in additional revenue, a meaningful contribution toward closing the city's projected $5.4 billion two-year budget gap. The proposal targets pass-through businesses broadly—encompassing finance, legal services, healthcare, and retail—while leaving large corporations outside its scope.
However, the plan faces a significant procedural hurdle and political headwind. Implementation requires approval from state lawmakers and Governor Kathy Hochul, who has already indicated opposition. Hochul has characterized the measure as a form of personal income tax increase, signaling that state-level support may be difficult to secure. The administration is simultaneously pressing the city to explore spending adjustments alongside any new revenue measures, reflecting broader tensions between state and municipal budget priorities.
Tax practitioners and policy analysts have raised concerns that an overly aggressive reduction could discourage voluntary participation in the optional PTET system itself, potentially undermining the expected revenue benefit. Other states have taken more measured approaches: Massachusetts and Connecticut have already adopted partial credit systems that retain a portion of revenue for state use, models that some New York supporters cite as viable alternatives for the state's adjustment.
The proposal remains part of ongoing negotiations over New York's broader budget framework, with resolution dependent on state approval and political consensus among key stakeholders.
The credit was originally established to mitigate the effects of the 2017 federal tax overhaul, which capped state and local tax deductions at $10,000 nationally. City officials estimate that reducing the credit to 75% could generate close to $1 billion in additional revenue, a meaningful contribution toward closing the city's projected $5.4 billion two-year budget gap. The proposal targets pass-through businesses broadly—encompassing finance, legal services, healthcare, and retail—while leaving large corporations outside its scope.
However, the plan faces a significant procedural hurdle and political headwind. Implementation requires approval from state lawmakers and Governor Kathy Hochul, who has already indicated opposition. Hochul has characterized the measure as a form of personal income tax increase, signaling that state-level support may be difficult to secure. The administration is simultaneously pressing the city to explore spending adjustments alongside any new revenue measures, reflecting broader tensions between state and municipal budget priorities.
Tax practitioners and policy analysts have raised concerns that an overly aggressive reduction could discourage voluntary participation in the optional PTET system itself, potentially undermining the expected revenue benefit. Other states have taken more measured approaches: Massachusetts and Connecticut have already adopted partial credit systems that retain a portion of revenue for state use, models that some New York supporters cite as viable alternatives for the state's adjustment.
The proposal remains part of ongoing negotiations over New York's broader budget framework, with resolution dependent on state approval and political consensus among key stakeholders.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.