Key Takeaways
- • At least 568 healthcare facilities operate through nonprofit-private equity joint ventures, according to a new report by the Private Equity Stakeholder Project, with the actual figure likely significantly higher based on incomplete public data disclosure.
- • More than one-fifth of private equity-owned hospitals operate under joint venture arrangements with nonprofit health systems, exemplified by Apollo Global Management-owned Lifepoint Health, which runs nearly two-thirds of its hospitals through such structures.
- • PE-backed joint ventures span multiple healthcare subsectors including inpatient rehabilitation, hospice, home health, behavioral health, ambulatory surgery centers, and urgent care facilities, creating complex ownership structures that current regulations have not adequately addressed.
- • Joint ventures enable PE firms to circumvent regulatory restrictions (such as state prohibitions on non-physician ownership of medical practices), avoid conversion challenges from nonprofit to for-profit status, and access private capital for real estate monetization strategies.
- • The report warns that while joint ventures may offer business advantages, they perpetuate the financial and operational risks associated with traditional PE buyouts in healthcare, including practices linked to high-profile health system bankruptcies.
Summary
The prevalence of this structure is particularly pronounced among established PE healthcare operators. Lifepoint Health, owned by Apollo Global Management, exemplifies this trend, operating nearly two-thirds of its hospital portfolio through joint venture arrangements rather than direct ownership. More broadly, the data indicates that over 20% of all PE-owned hospitals utilize joint venture configurations with nonprofit health systems as their operational vehicle.
These arrangements extend well beyond traditional hospital operations. The report documents PE-backed joint ventures across multiple healthcare subsectors including inpatient rehabilitation facilities, hospice providers, home health agencies, behavioral health services, ambulatory surgery centers, and urgent care networks. This diversification across care settings demonstrates a systematic strategy rather than isolated transactions, yet regulatory frameworks have not evolved to address the complexity and potential risks inherent in these structures.
The report identifies several strategic advantages driving PE adoption of the joint venture model. First, partnerships with existing nonprofit providers facilitate market expansion by leveraging established licenses, provider networks, and regulatory standing. Second, joint ventures allow PE firms to circumvent state-level ownership restrictions that prohibit non-physicians from owning medical practices. Third, they enable PE investors to avoid the operational and reputational friction of converting established nonprofit health systems to for-profit entities. Finally, joint ventures provide access to private capital while creating revenue opportunities through real estate transactions—a practice the report connects to recent high-profile health system bankruptcies.
Despite acknowledging potential business benefits, the PESP report concludes that PE-backed joint ventures retain the financial and operational risks characteristic of direct PE healthcare buyouts. The lack of regulatory evolution to monitor these increasingly complex ownership structures raises investor, operational, and patient care considerations for institutional stakeholders monitoring PE activity in the healthcare sector.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.