Key Takeaways
- • SEC Enforcement Director David Woodcock described the Division of Enforcement as undergoing a "recalibration" to "get back to basics," according to remarks at the 12th annual Government Enforcement Institute on Sept. 18.
- • The SEC is prioritizing cases involving conduct that harms investors, holding individual wrongdoers accountable, and returning money to harmed investors.
- • Covington partner Gerald Hodgkins argues the enforcement recalibration, which emphasizes fraud over technical violations, has coincided with a sharp decline in enforcement activity.
- • The approach departs from decades of SEC enforcement that consistently emphasized compliance with prophylactic regulatory requirements.
Summary
In remarks at the 12th annual Government Enforcement Institute on Sept. 18, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Enforcement Director David Woodcock described the Division of Enforcement as undergoing a "recalibration" intended to "refocus the enforcement program squarely on our mission and get back to basics," according to an analysis by Gerald Hodgkins published by Law360 on November 12, 2026.
Woodcock said the commission is prioritizing cases involving "conduct that harms investors, holding individual wrongdoers accountable, and pursuing opportunities to return money to harmed investors." The emphasis reflects a shift away from pursuing technical violations in favor of fraud-focused enforcement.
Hodgkins writes that this enforcement recalibration has led to a drastic decline in enforcement activity. He contends that the philosophy departs from decades of SEC enforcement practice, which has consistently promoted compliance with the agency's prophylactic requirements.
The article is partially behind a Law360 subscription paywall, so the full analysis, including any specific enforcement statistics, was not available for this summary.
Woodcock said the commission is prioritizing cases involving "conduct that harms investors, holding individual wrongdoers accountable, and pursuing opportunities to return money to harmed investors." The emphasis reflects a shift away from pursuing technical violations in favor of fraud-focused enforcement.
Hodgkins writes that this enforcement recalibration has led to a drastic decline in enforcement activity. He contends that the philosophy departs from decades of SEC enforcement practice, which has consistently promoted compliance with the agency's prophylactic requirements.
The article is partially behind a Law360 subscription paywall, so the full analysis, including any specific enforcement statistics, was not available for this summary.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.