Key Takeaways
- • Private equity–backed companies demonstrate significantly higher CEO turnover and external hiring compared to public companies: 71% of large U.S. companies (enterprise value >$1 billion) purchased by PE firms between 2010–2016 hired new CEOs under PE ownership, with 75% of those hires being external candidates and 67% complete outsiders.
- • Public company CEO markets show substantially lower mobility, with 80% of S&P 500 CEO transitions filled by internal promotions (1993–2012), contrasting sharply with the PE-driven labor market that prioritizes external talent acquisition.
- • The research, conducted by Harvard Business School's Paul A. Gompers, University of Chicago's Steven N. Kaplan, and Georgetown University's Vladimir Mukharlyamov, fills a critical gap in executive mobility literature by examining a previously understudied segment of the economy.
- • The disparity in hiring patterns suggests PE ownership structures create different incentives and constraints for executive recruitment compared to public company governance models, with implications for talent mobility and CEO compensation across portfolio companies.
Summary
Academic researchers at Harvard Business School, the University of Chicago, and Georgetown University have published empirical evidence demonstrating a starkly different CEO labor market within private equity–backed companies compared to their public market counterparts. The research, released August 10, 2022, challenges conventional assumptions about executive mobility by examining a segment largely absent from prior scholarship: the market for CEOs in larger PE-funded enterprises.
The study focuses on U.S. companies with enterprise values exceeding $1 billion that were acquired by private equity firms between 2010 and 2016. Among this cohort, 71% of portfolio companies hired new chief executives during PE ownership—a figure substantially higher than the internal promotion patterns documented in public markets. Of these newly appointed CEOs, approximately 75% were external hires, with 67% classified as complete outsiders to the portfolio company. This contrasts markedly with public company practices: research on S&P 500 companies from 1993 to 2012 shows that 80% of CEO transitions resulted in internal promotions, with 90% of all new CEOs drawn from existing executives, former executives, board members, or directors' professional networks. External hiring in public companies rarely exceeds 50%, even when turnover is performance-driven or forced.
The divergence in hiring patterns suggests that PE ownership structures create fundamentally different constraints and incentives for executive recruitment. Private equity firms, operating under concentrated ownership and performance-oriented investment timelines, appear more inclined to source external talent when leadership changes occur. This finding has material implications for executive compensation markets, talent mobility, and the strategic priorities PE sponsors place on operational change within portfolio companies. The research expands understanding of how ownership structure influences corporate governance decisions and executive labor market dynamics in the broader economy.
The study focuses on U.S. companies with enterprise values exceeding $1 billion that were acquired by private equity firms between 2010 and 2016. Among this cohort, 71% of portfolio companies hired new chief executives during PE ownership—a figure substantially higher than the internal promotion patterns documented in public markets. Of these newly appointed CEOs, approximately 75% were external hires, with 67% classified as complete outsiders to the portfolio company. This contrasts markedly with public company practices: research on S&P 500 companies from 1993 to 2012 shows that 80% of CEO transitions resulted in internal promotions, with 90% of all new CEOs drawn from existing executives, former executives, board members, or directors' professional networks. External hiring in public companies rarely exceeds 50%, even when turnover is performance-driven or forced.
The divergence in hiring patterns suggests that PE ownership structures create fundamentally different constraints and incentives for executive recruitment. Private equity firms, operating under concentrated ownership and performance-oriented investment timelines, appear more inclined to source external talent when leadership changes occur. This finding has material implications for executive compensation markets, talent mobility, and the strategic priorities PE sponsors place on operational change within portfolio companies. The research expands understanding of how ownership structure influences corporate governance decisions and executive labor market dynamics in the broader economy.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.