Key Takeaways
- • A Pittsburgh police detective is suspended with pay while the city investigates discrepancies in secondary employment documentation at a Target store in East Liberty, with specific allegations still undisclosed.
- • The current investigation mirrors a 2024 case involving Sergeant Brian Marckiscotto, who was accused of falsifying time sheets for the same Target location and fraudulently receiving nearly $6,000 in unearned compensation before resigning and completing a diversion program.
- • The detective under investigation has maintained an unblemished record with no prior disciplinary history, distinguishing this case from the previous officer misconduct at the same secondary employment venue.
- • Recurring issues at the same retail location suggest systemic vulnerabilities in secondary employment oversight and compensation controls within the Pittsburgh Police Bureau's off-duty detail program.
Summary
This case represents the second documented instance of secondary employment misconduct at the same Target location within two years. In 2024, Sergeant Brian Marckiscotto was charged with theft by deception after allegedly falsifying time sheets and fraudulently collecting approximately $6,000 in compensation for work never performed. Marckiscotto subsequently resigned from the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police and completed an accelerated rehabilitative disposition program, which resulted in record clearance for the first-time offender.
The current detective's situation differs materially in one respect: investigators describe him as having maintained a clean disciplinary record prior to the secondary employment investigation. Unlike Marckiscotto's documented falsification scheme, the precise allegations against the suspended detective have not been publicly disclosed, limiting assessment of the misconduct's scope or financial magnitude.
The recurring nature of compliance failures at this single retail venue raises institutional questions regarding the Pittsburgh Police Bureau's oversight mechanisms for secondary employment arrangements, compensation verification procedures, and supervisor accountability. The pattern suggests potential gaps in controls governing off-duty detail assignments and payment authentication that merit systemic remediation.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.