AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Blackstone Disputes Report of Downsized Asia Fund

Reported by Mingtiandi
Mar 2, 2022· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • Blackstone disputes a New Mexico State Investment Council report claiming Blackstone Real Estate Partners Asia III has a $7 billion fundraising target, reaffirming its $9 billion goal remains on track.
  • • The discrepancy emerged from New Mexico SIC meeting minutes (February 22) that listed the lower $7 billion figure, contradicting CEO Jonathan Gray's October earnings call confirmation of the $9 billion target.
  • • Blackstone had already closed $4 billion of the $9 billion target as of the third-quarter earnings announcement, with New Mexico committing $75 million to the fund.
  • • The New Mexico SIC's advisor, Townsend Group, recommended the commitment based on BREP Asia III's "unique advantages of size and scale" and Asia Pacific regional exposure.
  • • The dispute reflects a communication gap between Blackstone's investor communications and pension fund documentation, though both parties remain committed to the fund.
Summary
Blackstone has publicly rejected claims that it downsized its Asia real estate fundraising target, asserting that Blackstone Real Estate Partners Asia III remains on track to reach its $9 billion goal. The dispute arose after the New Mexico State Investment Council, a significant fund backer, issued meeting minutes on February 22 stating the vehicle was seeking $7 billion—a 22 percent reduction from the publicly announced target.

According to Blackstone representatives who contacted Mingtiandi, the New Mexico SIC's reported figure is inaccurate. The firm pointed to CEO Jonathan Gray's third-quarter earnings call in October, during which he explicitly confirmed the $9 billion fundraising objective. Gray had also disclosed at that time that BREP Asia III had already secured $4 billion in commitments, positioning the fund halfway to its stated target before the SIC's conflicting documentation surfaced.

The New Mexico State Investment Council, which manages four permanent funds for the state, committed $75 million to BREP Asia III and documented the commitment in its February 22 meeting minutes. The council's staff and external advisor Townsend Group recommended the allocation citing the fund's "unique advantages of size and scale" alongside exposure opportunities across the Asia Pacific region. However, those same minutes listed the fundraising target as $7 billion, creating confusion among stakeholders about the actual capital target.

The timing and source of the discrepancy remain unclear, but the episode highlights how pension fund documentation can diverge from company communications, potentially creating market uncertainty around major alternative investment vehicles. Blackstone's swift public correction underscores the firm's commitment to maintaining transparency with limited partners regarding fundraising milestones for its flagship Asia real estate strategy.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Mingtiandi Blackstone Disputes Report of Downsized Asia Fund