Key Takeaways
- • Zwi Williger, controlling shareholder of Willi-Food, is demanding a $1.8 million refund from Pagaya, claiming the AI-driven U.S. residential real estate fund has eroded investor capital by up to 80%.
- • Pagaya represented the fund to Williger in 2021 as a conservative, unleveraged, low-risk investment vehicle, but actual performance has diverged substantially from initial representations.
- • The fund holds approximately 1,400 single-family residential properties across the United States, targeting properties priced between $150,000–$450,000 with capitalization rates of at least 4%.
- • Investor capital remains locked in the fund through December 2027, with a possible extension to 2029, limiting redemption options for affected investors despite reported losses.
- • The dispute highlights potential misalignment between Pagaya's AI-driven investment thesis and actual portfolio performance in the residential real estate sector.
Summary
Zwi Williger, the controlling shareholder of Willi-Food International Ltd., has initiated a formal demand for a $1.8 million refund from Pagaya Technologies, asserting that the company's AI-driven U.S. residential real estate fund has destroyed between 60% and 80% of investor capital. According to a sharply worded attorney letter, Williger claims Pagaya misrepresented the fund's risk profile and investment characteristics when approaching him in Israel in 2021 at the fund's launch.
Williger alleges that Pagaya representatives described the fund as a conservative, low-risk investment vehicle with no leverage and minimal debt reliance. However, the fund's actual performance has proven substantially misaligned with these representations. The fund employs Pagaya's proprietary artificial intelligence technology to identify undervalued residential properties in the United States that theoretically represent compelling investment opportunities. The portfolio comprises approximately 1,400 single-family homes distributed across the country.
According to the fund's investment criteria, it targets properties within specific parameters designed to optimize risk-adjusted returns: purchase prices between $150,000 and $450,000, capitalization rates of at least 4%, minimum specifications of three bedrooms and two bathrooms, and construction dates from 1980 onward. Despite these selection criteria, the fund's performance has evidently deteriorated significantly since inception.
A critical constraint limiting investor recourse is the fund's lock-up structure. Capital remains trapped until the end of 2027, with potential extension through 2029, preventing affected investors from liquidating positions despite substantial reported losses. This extended timeline leaves Williger and other investors with limited options to mitigate exposure or recover capital in the near term. The dispute underscores growing questions about the efficacy of Pagaya's AI-driven underwriting models in the residential real estate market and the accuracy of its initial risk disclosures to institutional investors.
Williger alleges that Pagaya representatives described the fund as a conservative, low-risk investment vehicle with no leverage and minimal debt reliance. However, the fund's actual performance has proven substantially misaligned with these representations. The fund employs Pagaya's proprietary artificial intelligence technology to identify undervalued residential properties in the United States that theoretically represent compelling investment opportunities. The portfolio comprises approximately 1,400 single-family homes distributed across the country.
According to the fund's investment criteria, it targets properties within specific parameters designed to optimize risk-adjusted returns: purchase prices between $150,000 and $450,000, capitalization rates of at least 4%, minimum specifications of three bedrooms and two bathrooms, and construction dates from 1980 onward. Despite these selection criteria, the fund's performance has evidently deteriorated significantly since inception.
A critical constraint limiting investor recourse is the fund's lock-up structure. Capital remains trapped until the end of 2027, with potential extension through 2029, preventing affected investors from liquidating positions despite substantial reported losses. This extended timeline leaves Williger and other investors with limited options to mitigate exposure or recover capital in the near term. The dispute underscores growing questions about the efficacy of Pagaya's AI-driven underwriting models in the residential real estate market and the accuracy of its initial risk disclosures to institutional investors.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.