Key Takeaways
- • REET outperformed HAUZ significantly over the trailing 12 months, delivering 16.7% total return versus HAUZ's 1.5% return as of August 13, 2026, driven by broader global real estate exposure including U.S. markets.
- • HAUZ offers lower operating costs and higher income yield: 0.1% expense ratio (versus REET's 0.14%) and 3.6% dividend yield (versus REET's 3.3%), making it the preferred choice for cost-conscious, income-focused investors.
- • Asset base disparity reflects market preference for global diversification: REET commands $5.0 billion in AUM compared to HAUZ's $1.1 billion, indicating institutional and retail investor preference for broad-based real estate exposure.
- • Risk profiles are nearly identical: Both ETFs exhibit comparable beta of approximately 0.98–0.99 relative to the S&P 500, with HAUZ showing marginally higher maximum drawdown of 34.2% over five years versus REET's 32%, suggesting similar volatility characteristics.
- • Strategic positioning differs by investor objective: REET functions as a global one-stop real estate shop including U.S. exposure, while HAUZ serves investors seeking to diversify away from domestic U.S. real estate holdings through international-only allocation.
Summary
The comparison between iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) reveals a fundamental trade-off between growth performance and income efficiency. REET delivered substantially higher returns over the past year at 16.7% total return, significantly outpacing HAUZ's 1.5% return as of August 13, 2026. This performance differential reflects REET's broader mandate, which encompasses both U.S. and international real estate markets, providing exposure to income-producing properties including warehouses, apartments, and cell towers across developed and emerging markets.
The cost structure favors HAUZ for fee-sensitive allocators. HAUZ's expense ratio of 0.10% represents a $0.40 annual savings per $1,000 invested compared to REET's 0.14% fee—a meaningful differential for large institutional positions over extended holding periods. Additionally, HAUZ delivers superior income generation with a trailing 12-month dividend yield of 3.6% versus REET's 3.3%, making it more attractive for income-focused portfolios and those prioritizing cash distributions from real estate holdings.
Market adoption patterns underscore institutional confidence in REET's broader approach. REET maintains $5.0 billion in assets under management compared to HAUZ's $1.1 billion, suggesting investors favor comprehensive global exposure over geographically restricted international-only positioning. Both funds exhibit comparable risk characteristics, with beta near 0.98–0.99 relative to the S&P 500 and similar five-year volatility profiles, indicating that performance divergence stems primarily from allocation strategy rather than underlying risk profiles.
The strategic selection depends on investor objectives. REET serves as a diversified global real estate solution for investors seeking broad property market exposure. HAUZ targets allocators specifically seeking to reduce or eliminate U.S. real estate concentration, preferring international property markets while maintaining lower operational costs and higher yield characteristics. Given REET's superior 12-month performance and larger asset base, growth-oriented investors may favor broad exposure, while income-focused institutional investors with existing U.S. real estate allocations may find HAUZ's cost efficiency and yield advantage more compelling.
The cost structure favors HAUZ for fee-sensitive allocators. HAUZ's expense ratio of 0.10% represents a $0.40 annual savings per $1,000 invested compared to REET's 0.14% fee—a meaningful differential for large institutional positions over extended holding periods. Additionally, HAUZ delivers superior income generation with a trailing 12-month dividend yield of 3.6% versus REET's 3.3%, making it more attractive for income-focused portfolios and those prioritizing cash distributions from real estate holdings.
Market adoption patterns underscore institutional confidence in REET's broader approach. REET maintains $5.0 billion in assets under management compared to HAUZ's $1.1 billion, suggesting investors favor comprehensive global exposure over geographically restricted international-only positioning. Both funds exhibit comparable risk characteristics, with beta near 0.98–0.99 relative to the S&P 500 and similar five-year volatility profiles, indicating that performance divergence stems primarily from allocation strategy rather than underlying risk profiles.
The strategic selection depends on investor objectives. REET serves as a diversified global real estate solution for investors seeking broad property market exposure. HAUZ targets allocators specifically seeking to reduce or eliminate U.S. real estate concentration, preferring international property markets while maintaining lower operational costs and higher yield characteristics. Given REET's superior 12-month performance and larger asset base, growth-oriented investors may favor broad exposure, while income-focused institutional investors with existing U.S. real estate allocations may find HAUZ's cost efficiency and yield advantage more compelling.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.