Key Takeaways
- • The House of Representatives Committee on Finance and Public Assets initiated a formal probe of the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI) Real Estate Investment Fund, with particular focus on unauthorized spending and financial controls deficiencies.
- • MOFI has launched real estate investment fund vehicles targeting Nigeria's housing deficit, with fund sizes of N150 billion to N250 billion announced in recent initiatives aimed at expanding affordable homeownership access.
- • The committee chair, Ademorin Kuye (APC-Lagos), cited "reckless expenditure" without corresponding improvements to government services, signaling serious governance concerns over fund deployment and accountability.
- • The House of Representatives is simultaneously pursuing amendments to the MOFI Establishment Act to strengthen the agency's mandate and operational oversight, indicating systemic governance deficiencies requiring legislative intervention.
- • Fraud risks have emerged around MOFI's real estate fund, with the Housing Development Advocacy Network (HDAN) warning of fraudulent facilitators targeting the investment vehicle, adding operational risk to fund implementation.
Summary
The House of Representatives Committee on Finance and Public Assets launched a formal investigation into the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI) Real Estate Investment Fund on Tuesday, June 1, 2026, centered on allegations of unauthorized spending and inadequate financial controls. Committee chairman Ademorin Kuye (APC-Lagos) publicly criticized MOFI for what he characterized as "reckless expenditure" that failed to generate corresponding improvements in government service delivery, establishing a clear governance dispute over fund stewardship and capital allocation discipline.
MOFI has positioned its real estate investment fund as a market-driven mortgage initiative designed to address Nigeria's persistent housing deficit and expand access to affordable homeownership. The fund vehicles announced include structures capitalized at N150 billion and N250 billion, representing substantial commitments to residential real estate financing. However, the committee's investigation suggests that implementation and financial controls have not aligned with intended outcomes or fiduciary standards expected of government-backed finance institutions.
Compounding governance concerns, the House of Representatives is actively pursuing amendments to the MOFI Establishment Act itself, signaling that legislative leadership views the underlying statutory framework as insufficient for effective oversight and operational accountability. This dual-track approach—simultaneous investigation of fund performance and legislative restructuring of MOFI's mandate—indicates structural deficiencies requiring both immediate accountability measures and longer-term institutional reform.
Additional operational risks have surfaced regarding fraud. The Housing Development Advocacy Network (HDAN) has publicly warned of fraudulent actors misrepresenting themselves as fund facilitators, creating reputational and transactional risks for legitimate investors and beneficiaries engaging with MOFI's real estate financing programs. These fraud alerts compound the credibility challenges facing the fund as the committee's investigation proceeds.
MOFI has positioned its real estate investment fund as a market-driven mortgage initiative designed to address Nigeria's persistent housing deficit and expand access to affordable homeownership. The fund vehicles announced include structures capitalized at N150 billion and N250 billion, representing substantial commitments to residential real estate financing. However, the committee's investigation suggests that implementation and financial controls have not aligned with intended outcomes or fiduciary standards expected of government-backed finance institutions.
Compounding governance concerns, the House of Representatives is actively pursuing amendments to the MOFI Establishment Act itself, signaling that legislative leadership views the underlying statutory framework as insufficient for effective oversight and operational accountability. This dual-track approach—simultaneous investigation of fund performance and legislative restructuring of MOFI's mandate—indicates structural deficiencies requiring both immediate accountability measures and longer-term institutional reform.
Additional operational risks have surfaced regarding fraud. The Housing Development Advocacy Network (HDAN) has publicly warned of fraudulent actors misrepresenting themselves as fund facilitators, creating reputational and transactional risks for legitimate investors and beneficiaries engaging with MOFI's real estate financing programs. These fraud alerts compound the credibility challenges facing the fund as the committee's investigation proceeds.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.