Key Takeaways
- • Artiman Ventures III LP (2010 vintage, $200M committed capital) posted negative returns of -3.48% IRR with a 0.90x multiple, indicating underperformance during the fund's lifecycle.
- • Artiman Ventures II LP (2007 vintage, $185M committed capital) delivered 1.95% IRR with a 1.10x multiple, modestly outperforming its cost of capital but generating limited value creation for limited partners.
- • Artiman Ventures Special Opportunities Fund LP (2012 vintage, $133M committed capital) achieved 2.37% IRR with a 1.07x multiple, suggesting marginal returns relative to venture market benchmarks during its investment period.
- • Total committed capital across three performing funds reaches approximately $518M, with returns ranging from -3.48% to 2.37% IRR, reflecting mixed performance across vintage years spanning 2004 to 2012.
Summary
The firm's most challenged fund, Artiman Ventures III LP, launched in 2010 with $200 million in committed capital, generated negative returns of -3.48% IRR and a 0.90x multiple. This underperformance reflects the difficult exit environment and valuation corrections that characterized venture outcomes from investments made during the late-2000s technology cycle. Conversely, Artiman Ventures II LP, established in 2007 with $185 million committed, posted slightly positive 1.95% IRR with a 1.10x multiple—a result that suggests modest value creation but returns insufficient to meaningfully compensate limited partners for capital deployment and opportunity cost.
The Special Opportunities Fund LP, with a 2012 vintage and $133 million in committed capital, represents the firm's strongest performer to date, achieving 2.37% IRR and a 1.07x multiple. However, even this result trails historical venture capital median returns, which typically exceed 15% IRR in strong market environments. Artiman Ventures I, launched in 2004, disclosed committed capital of $165 million but no performance figures in the available data, limiting full assessment of the firm's earliest fund.
Across the firm's portfolio, the IRRs and multiples suggest that Artiman Ventures' strategy and execution have faced headwinds in generating excess returns relative to venture capital peer performance and limited partner return expectations during these vintage periods.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.