AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Mandation was never the way to get pensions investing in venture capital

Reported by City-am ·Cityam
Apr 30, 2026· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • The UK government compromised on the Pension Schemes Bill, capping mandatory venture capital allocation at 10% of default pension funds, with no more than 5% directed to UK assets, moving away from more aggressive mandation proposals.
  • • The Mansion House Accord, signed by 17 major pension providers in summer 2025, pledges 10% allocation to private markets by 2030 with 50% earmarked for UK investments, demonstrating voluntary self-regulation can achieve desired pension-to-VC capital flows.
  • • Venture capital industry observers argue that self-regulation and voluntary commitments produce better outcomes than statutory mandation, which risks generating poor returns and undermining accountability in pension fund management.
  • • The revised bill reflects House of Lords concerns about overly restrictive mandation requirements, suggesting legislative pressure succeeded in tempering government ambitions for mandatory pension-VC exposure.
Summary
The UK government has substantially watered down mandatory pension investment requirements in the Pension Schemes Bill following sustained pressure from the House of Lords. The final legislative compromise includes hard statutory caps limiting mandation to 10% of default pension funds, with no more than 5% directed toward UK assets. This represents a significant retreat from earlier, more aggressive proposals.

Duncan Johnson, writing on behalf of the venture capital community, argues that self-regulation rather than statutory mandation represents the superior pathway for channeling pension capital into venture assets. The primary evidence for this position is the Mansion House Accord, negotiated in summer 2025, wherein 17 major pension providers voluntarily committed to investing 10% of their default funds in private markets by 2030, with half of that allocation earmarked for UK investments. According to Johnson, this voluntary framework demonstrates that industry stakeholders can achieve substantial capital reallocation without legislative coercion.

Johnson contends that mandated investing produces structural misalignment between pension fiduciaries' actual capital allocation decisions and their accountability to beneficiaries. He argues that the most likely outcome of forced venture capital allocations is poor investment returns and failure to generate the growth required for next-generation economic development. In contrast, self-regulation and voluntary commitments create accountability through market reputation and fiduciary obligation rather than legal penalty, theorizing that these mechanisms produce superior capital allocation discipline.

The Mansion House Accord framework highlights the UK's historical underinvestment in private assets and establishes ongoing dialogue mechanisms to encourage broader private asset class adoption across pension portfolios. Industry consensus, as reflected in this analysis, frames the legislative compromise as a victory for proportionate policymaking, though venture capital participants view even the reduced 10% cap as suboptimal relative to the Accord's voluntary 10% target.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

2 outlets

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

City-am Mandation was never the way to get pensions investing in venture capital Cityam Mandation was never the way to get pensions investing in venture capital