Key Takeaways
- • Open banking fraud rates dropped 38% year-over-year, declining from 0.021% to 0.013% per transaction volume, significantly outperforming the industry average of 0.045% across all payment types.
- • Open banking fraud remains approximately one in 6,000 transactions, demonstrating resilience and positioning the channel as a materially safer alternative to legacy payment rails despite ongoing fraud pressures across the broader payments ecosystem.
- • Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud accounts for 74% of open banking fraud cases, reflecting a systemic challenge affecting the entire payments industry rather than a vulnerability unique to open banking channels.
- • Industry collaboration, standardized data sharing, and advanced risk management tools such as Transaction Risk Indicators (TRIs) are proving effective in identifying and mitigating fraudulent transactions within open banking infrastructure.
- • Open Banking Limited's 2025 financial crime report confirms that fraud prevention can be achieved through robust API security architecture and strong foundational design without materially increasing friction for legitimate payment processing.
Summary
Open banking has emerged as a demonstrably lower-risk payment channel relative to industry benchmarks, according to data released by Open Banking Limited in its 2025 financial crime report. Fraud rates in open banking-initiated payments fell 38% year-over-year, declining from 0.021% to 0.013% per transaction volume—a performance substantially better than the 0.045% fraud rate across all payment types industry-wide. This represents approximately one fraudulent transaction per 6,000 open banking payments processed.
The resilience of open banking channels reflects both the underlying security architecture of API-enabled payment infrastructure and the effectiveness of industry-wide collaborative fraud prevention efforts. While fraud continues to rise across the broader payments ecosystem, open banking has maintained a steady decline in fraud rates, positioning it as a structurally safer alternative to traditional payment rails. The findings underscore that open banking was engineered with security as a foundational principle, enabling faster and more flexible payment processing without proportional increases in fraud exposure.
Authorised Push Payment fraud dominates open banking fraud cases, accounting for 74% of all incidents. This concentration mirrors the wider payments industry, indicating that APP fraud represents a systemic challenge rather than a vulnerability specific to open banking channels. The data suggests that addressing APP fraud requires industry-wide coordination and consumer education rather than architectural changes to open banking infrastructure itself.
The continued decline in open banking fraud has been supported by enhanced risk management capabilities, particularly the deployment of Transaction Risk Indicators (TRIs) and other advanced analytical tools that identify potentially fraudulent payments at the point of initiation. Industry participants emphasize that strong security practices need not impose excessive friction on legitimate transactions, a principle central to open banking's design philosophy. Sustained fraud prevention in the channel will depend on continued collaboration among regulated providers, standardized data sharing protocols, and refinement of risk detection technologies.
The resilience of open banking channels reflects both the underlying security architecture of API-enabled payment infrastructure and the effectiveness of industry-wide collaborative fraud prevention efforts. While fraud continues to rise across the broader payments ecosystem, open banking has maintained a steady decline in fraud rates, positioning it as a structurally safer alternative to traditional payment rails. The findings underscore that open banking was engineered with security as a foundational principle, enabling faster and more flexible payment processing without proportional increases in fraud exposure.
Authorised Push Payment fraud dominates open banking fraud cases, accounting for 74% of all incidents. This concentration mirrors the wider payments industry, indicating that APP fraud represents a systemic challenge rather than a vulnerability specific to open banking channels. The data suggests that addressing APP fraud requires industry-wide coordination and consumer education rather than architectural changes to open banking infrastructure itself.
The continued decline in open banking fraud has been supported by enhanced risk management capabilities, particularly the deployment of Transaction Risk Indicators (TRIs) and other advanced analytical tools that identify potentially fraudulent payments at the point of initiation. Industry participants emphasize that strong security practices need not impose excessive friction on legitimate transactions, a principle central to open banking's design philosophy. Sustained fraud prevention in the channel will depend on continued collaboration among regulated providers, standardized data sharing protocols, and refinement of risk detection technologies.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.