Key Takeaways
- • The Australian Government introduced the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 to parliament on a Tuesday, presented by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, revising capital gains tax concessions for startups and technology firms.
- • The bill lowers the predominant-activity test threshold for the Innovative Business CGT Concession (IBCC) from the September draft's greater than 75% to greater than 50% of operations, broadening eligibility.
- • The revised workforce metric now includes contractors and external service providers, rather than only formal employees, and the asset metric covers capital assets held for future qualifying use.
- • The IBCC grants eligible founders, employees and investors a 50% discount on capital gains from qualifying equity investments, and is designed to operate alongside R&D Tax Incentive changes and expanded venture capital frameworks.
- • Some startup stakeholders remain critical of the concurrent R&D funding plans, citing compliance burden, even as the CGT revisions are broadly welcomed as a pragmatic compromise.
Summary
The Australian Government has introduced revised legislation to reform capital gains tax (CGT) concessions for the technology and startup sectors. Treasurer Jim Chalmers presented the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 to parliament on Tuesday, following what the source describes as intense industry consultation. The bill sets out the mechanics of the Innovative Business CGT Concession (IBCC), which provides eligible founders, employees and investors a 50% discount on capital gains from qualifying equity investments.
The bill represents a retreat from harsher preliminary guidelines issued in September, which had drawn widespread concern among venture capital stakeholders. The most significant change concerns the predominant-activity test, which determines whether a company maintains sufficient focus on qualifying innovative operations and therefore acts as the primary gatekeeper for the CGT discount. The September draft required at least two of three core metrics (assets, employees and income) to exceed 75% in relation to innovative activities. Industry bodies argued this was impractically rigid and could disqualify legitimate startups generating secondary revenue or diversifying their asset bases during scaling. The revised bill lowers the requirement to more than 50%. The assessment will use the startup's most recently completed financial year as the reference point.
Beyond the threshold, the metrics themselves have been broadened. The workforce measure now explicitly includes contractors and external service providers, rather than relying strictly on formal employee headcounts, reflecting the project-based contractor model common in the tech sector. The asset measure now includes capital assets held for future qualifying use, so startups acquiring specialised equipment or holding intellectual property before full integration are not penalised. According to the source, these changes collectively reduce the risk that founders or early backers lose CGT concessions due to structural evolution as businesses scale.
The bill was introduced alongside proposed amendments to the broader Research and Development (R&D) Tax Incentive and expanded venture capital frameworks. The government intends the IBCC to operate in tandem with these structures, with the stated aim of stimulating domestic venture capital flow and retaining high-growth companies in Australia by lowering the tax burden on successful exits. While the CGT revisions have been largely welcomed as a pragmatic compromise, some startup stakeholders continue to object to the R&D funding plans, arguing that compliance burdens offset their financial benefit. The bill will proceed through parliamentary readings, and the source notes that Treasury must ensure the predominant-activity test remains resilient against exploitation while providing certainty to genuine innovators and backers.
The bill represents a retreat from harsher preliminary guidelines issued in September, which had drawn widespread concern among venture capital stakeholders. The most significant change concerns the predominant-activity test, which determines whether a company maintains sufficient focus on qualifying innovative operations and therefore acts as the primary gatekeeper for the CGT discount. The September draft required at least two of three core metrics (assets, employees and income) to exceed 75% in relation to innovative activities. Industry bodies argued this was impractically rigid and could disqualify legitimate startups generating secondary revenue or diversifying their asset bases during scaling. The revised bill lowers the requirement to more than 50%. The assessment will use the startup's most recently completed financial year as the reference point.
Beyond the threshold, the metrics themselves have been broadened. The workforce measure now explicitly includes contractors and external service providers, rather than relying strictly on formal employee headcounts, reflecting the project-based contractor model common in the tech sector. The asset measure now includes capital assets held for future qualifying use, so startups acquiring specialised equipment or holding intellectual property before full integration are not penalised. According to the source, these changes collectively reduce the risk that founders or early backers lose CGT concessions due to structural evolution as businesses scale.
The bill was introduced alongside proposed amendments to the broader Research and Development (R&D) Tax Incentive and expanded venture capital frameworks. The government intends the IBCC to operate in tandem with these structures, with the stated aim of stimulating domestic venture capital flow and retaining high-growth companies in Australia by lowering the tax burden on successful exits. While the CGT revisions have been largely welcomed as a pragmatic compromise, some startup stakeholders continue to object to the R&D funding plans, arguing that compliance burdens offset their financial benefit. The bill will proceed through parliamentary readings, and the source notes that Treasury must ensure the predominant-activity test remains resilient against exploitation while providing certainty to genuine innovators and backers.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.