AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Standardization and Innovation in Venture Capital Contracting: Evidence from Startup Company Charters - The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

Reported by Corpgov.law.harvard
Oct 17, 2023· 1 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • NVCA model charter adoption surged from <3% in 2004 to 85% by 2022, driven primarily by the six most active law firms servicing U.S. startups, establishing near-universal standardization in Series A financing documents over two decades.
  • • Delaware incorporation became dominant standard, growing from 54% of sample charters in 2004 to 100% by 2022, directly correlating with adoption of the Delaware-oriented NVCA model.
  • • Capital structures grew substantially more complex despite standardized templates, with charters authorizing only common stock and single Series A preferred stock declining from 86% (2004) to just 5% (2022), while 30% of 2022 charters contained either 2+ common stock classes or 3+ preferred stock series.
  • • Complexity driven entirely by prior seed-stage financing, not founder-friendly innovations—dual class common stock and founder preferred stock made only modest inroads despite standardization efforts.
  • • Research analyzed nearly 5,000 Series A charters (2004–2022) using cosine similarity analysis, documenting the tension between template standardization and increasing structural complexity in venture capital contracting.
Summary
Stanford Law School professor Robert Bartlett's comprehensive examination of venture capital contracting reveals a paradoxical two-decade trend: while the industry has achieved unprecedented standardization around the National Venture Capital Association's 2003 model charter, the actual capital structures underlying these standardized documents have grown substantially more complex.

The standardization success is undeniable. Bartlett's analysis of nearly 5,000 Series A charters from 2004 to 2022 documents adoption of the NVCA model increasing from less than 3% to nearly 85% by 2022. This transformation reflects the concentrated influence of the six most active law firms serving U.S. startups, which effectively normalized the model across the ecosystem. The standardization project also drove Delaware incorporation to near-universality, rising from 54% of charters in 2004 to 100% by 2022, establishing the Delaware-oriented framework as the de facto standard for U.S. venture-backed startups.

However, beneath this standardized template surface lies escalating complexity. Series A charters with only a single common stock class and single Series A preferred stock series represented 86% of 2004 charters but declined to just 5% by 2022. Simultaneously, 30% of 2022 charters incorporated either two or more common stock classes or three or more preferred stock series. This structural proliferation stems almost entirely from prior seed-stage financing reflected in the charter, rather than from innovations in founder-friendly securities such as dual class common stock or founder preferred stock, which achieved only modest adoption gains.

The research underscores a critical distinction for investors and company counsel: standardization of contractual templates does not eliminate—and may even obscure—the growing complexity of capitalization structures in venture-backed companies. This dynamic has material implications for cap table management, future financing rounds, and governance considerations in Series A and later-stage investments. The disconnect between standardized legal forms and increasingly intricate capital structures suggests that investors and legal professionals should scrutinize charter complexity independent of reliance on NVCA model familiarity.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Corpgov.law.harvard Standardization and Innovation in Venture Capital Contracting: Evidence from Startup Company Charters - The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance