AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Startups wouldn’t exist under tax reform, inquiry told

Reported by Michaelwest
Jun 16, 2026· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • Australia's Labor government capital gains tax (CGT) reform threatens startup viability by removing tax incentives that currently encourage early-stage investment, with Senate inquiry witnesses arguing the changes would prevent companies like Canva from being founded.
  • • Investor Geoff Wilson's A$6 billion asset management group stands to benefit from the current tax reform proposal, creating a conflict between large institutional investors and founders over reform structure.
  • • Multiple startup founders and venture capital advocates told the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) inquiry that the proposed CGT changes fundamentally alter the risk-reward equation for early-stage company building and equity-based compensation.
  • • The Treasurer defended the reforms as policy necessary for broader economic objectives, while Labor backbenchers expressed growing concern about unintended consequences for the startup ecosystem, signaling internal government tension over carve-outs.
  • • Opposition Liberal-National Coalition positioned tax reform repeal as a policy platform, pledging to "axe all of Labor's bad taxes" including the small business and trust tax elements bundled with the CGT changes.
Summary
Australia's proposed capital gains tax reform has triggered significant opposition from the startup sector, with Senate inquiry witnesses arguing the changes would make early-stage company formation economically unviable. The Labor government's budget introduced contentious modifications to the CGT discount structure, fundamentally reshaping incentives for founders and early investors. During parliamentary inquiry testimony, venture capital stakeholders presented evidence that the reform would prevent the emergence of transformational companies—specifically citing design platform Canva as a case study that would not exist under the new tax settings.

The inquiry revealed fault lines within Australia's investor class. Geoff Wilson, managing a A$6 billion asset management group, directly benefits from the current reform proposal, creating a structural conflict between large institutional capital and startup founders. This dynamic emerged as the Treasurer defended the government's broader tax policy agenda while acknowledging growing unrest on the Labor backbench regarding unintended consequences for startup investment.

Founders who transitioned from corporate careers to early-stage ventures testified that the proposed CGT changes materially discourage entrepreneurship by removing preferential tax treatment historically used to offset early-stage business risk. The inquiry focused on whether the reforms would inadvertently eliminate artificial barriers to business formation while simultaneously removing incentives that had encouraged equity-based compensation and founder participation in venture capital rounds.

The political dimension intensified as Labor members indicated openness to potential carve-outs or modifications specifically protecting startup investment, while the Opposition Coalition adopted a broader tax repeal platform targeting the entire reform package—including modifications to small business taxation and trust structures bundled with the CGT changes.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Michaelwest Startups wouldn’t exist under tax reform, inquiry told