AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Verisk: Global modelled losses – a clear benchmark in a shifting risk transfer market

Reported by Theinsurer
Sep 5, 2026· 3 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • Verisk raised its global insured catastrophe loss benchmark to $171 billion annually, a $19 billion increase year-over-year and the highest estimate the firm has reported to date, reflecting structural shifts in the risk landscape rather than cyclical weather patterns.
  • • The 2025 insurance year experienced below-average catastrophe losses and saw zero U.S. hurricane landfalls for the first time in a decade, yet total insured losses still exceeded $100 billion—the sixth consecutive year above this threshold, underscoring persistent exposure growth regardless of weather volatility.
  • • Rising reconstruction costs, continued development in catastrophe-prone regions, and global exposure growth are the primary drivers of elevated loss expectations, indicating that soft market conditions following quiet hurricane seasons mask deteriorating underlying risk fundamentals.
  • • The United States accounts for $117 billion of the $171 billion global benchmark, with severe thunderstorms emerging as a leading peril alongside traditional hurricane risk, signaling a broadening catastrophe exposure profile beyond hurricane-dependent models.
  • • Verisk's updated benchmark functions as a critical pricing and capital adequacy reference point for the insurance and reinsurance sectors, establishing expectations for year-over-year loss absorption capacity as markets reassess risk transfer mechanisms.
Summary
Verisk's catastrophe modeling division released its 2026 Global Modeled Catastrophe Losses Report on September 1, 2026, establishing a new industry benchmark for annual insured catastrophe losses at $171 billion—a material $19 billion increase from the prior year and the highest estimate Verisk has published to date. This upward revision reflects structural changes in the global risk environment driven by rising property values, expanding insured exposures, and escalating reconstruction costs, rather than deterioration in weather patterns alone.

The timing of this benchmark elevation carries particular significance given that 2025 marked the first year in a decade without U.S. hurricane landfalls, typically a catalyst for market-wide complacency and rate softening. Despite this favorable hurricane season, total insured losses exceeded $100 billion for the sixth consecutive year. Rob Newbold, president of Verisk Catastrophe and Risk Solutions, characterized this dynamic as a critical inflection point: quiet hurricane seasons historically prompt insurers to reduce risk retention, capital providers to intensify competitive bidding, and pricing to soften—dynamics that mask an underlying risk landscape fundamentally altered by exposure growth and rising reconstruction values. The firm emphasized that below-average loss years should not be misinterpreted as evidence of structural risk mitigation.

The United States represents the largest concentration of risk within the global benchmark, accounting for $117 billion of the $171 billion total. The report identifies severe thunderstorms as a leading peril, signaling a shift in catastrophe exposure profiles toward weather events beyond traditional hurricane modeling. This diversification of primary perils reflects both climate-related changes and evolving development patterns in regions historically underweighted in catastrophe loss frameworks.

For institutional investors, reinsurers, and insurers, Verisk's updated benchmark serves as a foundational reference for capital adequacy planning, pricing discipline, and risk transfer structuring. The $171 billion annual loss expectation establishes a higher baseline for loss reserve provisioning and reinsurance purchasing, directly impacting underwriting economics across the sector. The disconnect between favorable single-year loss experience and elevated structural loss expectations underscores the importance of relying on multi-year modeled averages rather than cyclical outcomes when assessing catastrophe exposure and pricing adequacy.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Theinsurer Verisk: Global modelled losses – a clear benchmark in a shifting risk transfer market