Key Takeaways
- • Norway's government-appointed ethics commission recommended on Thursday, October 15, 2026, that the $2.3 trillion sovereign wealth fund be allowed to invest in major Western defence groups currently excluded for nuclear weapons involvement, potentially opening tens of billions of dollars in weapons-maker investments if adopted by parliament.
- • The proposed exemption would cover companies domiciled in nuclear-weapon states under the Non-Proliferation Treaty that are allied with NATO member Norway, reinstating British, French and American names such as Airbus, Boeing, BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin, per Reuters.
- • The commission proposed limiting the Council on Ethics to analysing ethical breaches rather than recommending divestments, with the central bank deciding whether to divest and whether to publish assessments.
- • Civil society groups, including the Norwegian Red Cross, criticised the proposals as a weakening of the fund's ethical rules and a precedent other international investors may follow.
- • A minority Labour government would have sufficient parliamentary support to adopt the proposal; the finance ministry is expected to submit its own suggestions in spring 2027.
Summary
A government-appointed commission in Norway recommended on Thursday that the country's $2.3 trillion sovereign wealth fund be permitted to invest in major Western defence groups, according to Reuters. The companies currently barred from the portfolio because of their involvement in nuclear arms production include Airbus, Boeing, BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin, Safran, Thales, BWX Technologies, Northrop Grumman, Fluor, General Dynamics, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Jacobs Solutions, L3Harris Technologies and L&T. The proposal would exempt companies domiciled in nuclear-weapon states under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons that are allied with NATO. Commission head Svein Gjedrem said this would allow reinvestment in several British, French and American weapons companies. Reuters reports that the change could result in investments of tens of billions of dollars if adopted by parliament.
The recommendations form part of a broader overhaul of the fund's ethics framework. The commission proposed that the Council on Ethics, the fund's independent watchdog, should continue to exist but no longer advise on a course of action, providing only analyses of ethical breaches. Decisions on divestment, on whether to publish the watchdog's assessments, and on timing and format would rest with the central bank, which operates the fund. The commission also said particular care should be taken with the largest holdings, since divesting from them would have a greater impact on the fund's value. Under the previous arrangement, the central bank board usually followed the council's recommendations, and the fund's published rationales were followed by many global institutional investors.
Civil society opposition has been strong. The Norwegian Red Cross, through chief Grete Herlofson, said investing in such weapons signals that they are acceptable and endangers lives. Tale Hungnes, leader of advocacy group Future in Our Hands, said the proposal would render the watchdog "toothless". Norway's parliament paused ethics-based divestments last year, weeks after the Trump administration criticised the fund for divesting from Caterpillar over the use of its bulldozers in Gaza and the occupied West Bank; that pause remains pending the review's outcome. Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg had requested the review, citing changes in the global security environment and Norway's reliance on the NATO nuclear umbrella.
Gjedrem said the fund's growing size has increased its visibility abroad and its vulnerability to countermeasures in a more fragmented, transactional geopolitical environment, though he did not name any country. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham had earlier suggested tariffs and visa revocations in response to the Caterpillar divestment. Stoltenberg said the fund would continue to be ethical, but that the question is how it remains so in a changing world. The minority Labour government would have enough parliamentary support to pass the proposal, and the finance ministry is expected to present its own suggestions in spring 2027.
The recommendations form part of a broader overhaul of the fund's ethics framework. The commission proposed that the Council on Ethics, the fund's independent watchdog, should continue to exist but no longer advise on a course of action, providing only analyses of ethical breaches. Decisions on divestment, on whether to publish the watchdog's assessments, and on timing and format would rest with the central bank, which operates the fund. The commission also said particular care should be taken with the largest holdings, since divesting from them would have a greater impact on the fund's value. Under the previous arrangement, the central bank board usually followed the council's recommendations, and the fund's published rationales were followed by many global institutional investors.
Civil society opposition has been strong. The Norwegian Red Cross, through chief Grete Herlofson, said investing in such weapons signals that they are acceptable and endangers lives. Tale Hungnes, leader of advocacy group Future in Our Hands, said the proposal would render the watchdog "toothless". Norway's parliament paused ethics-based divestments last year, weeks after the Trump administration criticised the fund for divesting from Caterpillar over the use of its bulldozers in Gaza and the occupied West Bank; that pause remains pending the review's outcome. Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg had requested the review, citing changes in the global security environment and Norway's reliance on the NATO nuclear umbrella.
Gjedrem said the fund's growing size has increased its visibility abroad and its vulnerability to countermeasures in a more fragmented, transactional geopolitical environment, though he did not name any country. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham had earlier suggested tariffs and visa revocations in response to the Caterpillar divestment. Stoltenberg said the fund would continue to be ethical, but that the question is how it remains so in a changing world. The minority Labour government would have enough parliamentary support to pass the proposal, and the finance ministry is expected to present its own suggestions in spring 2027.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.