Key Takeaways
- • The House of Lords voted down a legislative amendment that would have given the UK government power to issue statutory guidance on fiduciary duty and ESG considerations for trustees.
- • The defeat is a setback for the government's effort to clarify how pension and trust fiduciaries may factor environmental, social and governance issues into investment decisions.
- • Trustees and asset owners remain without new statutory guidance on this question following the vote, according to the Responsible Investor report.
Summary
The House of Lords has voted down a legislative amendment designed to give the UK government the power to produce statutory guidance on fiduciary duty and environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations for trustees, according to Responsible Investor.
The amendment would have enabled the government to set out, in statutory form, how trustees should approach fiduciary duty when ESG factors are relevant to investment decisions. The question of whether and how trustees may integrate ESG considerations into their duties has been a long-running source of debate among UK pension funds, trustees and asset managers, with uncertainty over the legal boundaries often cited by market participants.
The defeat in the Lords represents an obstacle to the government's stated objective of providing clarity in this area. The full source material available for this summary is limited, and further detail on the specific arguments raised during the debate, the government's response, or the timing of any subsequent attempt was not available in the primary article.
Institutional investors and trustees should monitor whether the government seeks an alternative legislative route or issues guidance through other channels.
The amendment would have enabled the government to set out, in statutory form, how trustees should approach fiduciary duty when ESG factors are relevant to investment decisions. The question of whether and how trustees may integrate ESG considerations into their duties has been a long-running source of debate among UK pension funds, trustees and asset managers, with uncertainty over the legal boundaries often cited by market participants.
The defeat in the Lords represents an obstacle to the government's stated objective of providing clarity in this area. The full source material available for this summary is limited, and further detail on the specific arguments raised during the debate, the government's response, or the timing of any subsequent attempt was not available in the primary article.
Institutional investors and trustees should monitor whether the government seeks an alternative legislative route or issues guidance through other channels.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.