Key Takeaways
- • Investment platforms are significantly lagging in offering alternative investment options through managed accounts, creating a disconnect between industry consensus on alternatives' strategic importance and actual product availability for advisors and their clients.
- • Financial advisors anticipate increasing alternative allocations from 7% to just under 10% within two years, signaling strong institutional demand for alternative exposure, particularly among advisors managing less than $100 million in assets.
- • Managed account users demonstrate tangible performance benefits, achieving approximately 2% higher annualized returns compared to investors not using allocation products, underscoring the value proposition of professionally managed alternatives strategies.
- • Advisors are requesting simpler, more flexible alternative investment products, but asset managers and platforms remain constrained in meeting these needs, with many still not offering direct indexing options or liquid alternative funds to wealth managers.
- • The alternatives marketplace is experiencing intensified competition as asset managers expand client portfolio allocations to the segment, fundamentally repositioning alternatives from peripheral holdings to core portfolio components.
Summary
The alternative investment industry faces a critical supply-demand imbalance: while institutional consensus recognizes alternatives as increasingly central to portfolio strategy, investment platforms and managed account providers have failed to deliver corresponding product offerings. According to industry research, managed account platforms continue to provide limited access to alternative investment options despite widespread acknowledgment that alternatives are "forming the spine of portfolio strategy" rather than remaining niche allocations.
Advisor demand for alternatives is accelerating. Financial advisors anticipate raising their allocation to alternatives from 7% to just under 10% within two years, with particularly strong interest among smaller advisory firms managing under $100 million in assets. This expansion reflects both institutional conviction in alternatives' portfolio benefits and recognition of their role in managing market volatility. However, advisors report that available products fail to meet their operational preferences—they specifically seek simpler, more flexible solutions that current market offerings do not adequately provide.
The performance case for managed alternatives remains compelling. Investors utilizing managed account allocation products achieve average annualized returns approximately 2% higher than those without such structures, representing meaningful alpha generation over multi-year periods. This performance differential directly supports advisor confidence in recommending alternatives to clients and justifies the anticipated allocation increases.
Asset managers face capacity and capability constraints in meeting institutional demand. Industry surveys indicate that many managers remain unable to offer direct indexing capabilities or liquid alternative funds, creating friction in advisor adoption. Broadridge's client success team has acknowledged these limitations while the broader industry faces intensified competitive pressure as traditional asset managers aggressively expand alternatives offerings. The alternatives marketplace has grown significantly more competitive, yet platform infrastructure has not kept pace with market expectations, leaving advisors unable to efficiently implement their strategic allocation preferences for clients.
Advisor demand for alternatives is accelerating. Financial advisors anticipate raising their allocation to alternatives from 7% to just under 10% within two years, with particularly strong interest among smaller advisory firms managing under $100 million in assets. This expansion reflects both institutional conviction in alternatives' portfolio benefits and recognition of their role in managing market volatility. However, advisors report that available products fail to meet their operational preferences—they specifically seek simpler, more flexible solutions that current market offerings do not adequately provide.
The performance case for managed alternatives remains compelling. Investors utilizing managed account allocation products achieve average annualized returns approximately 2% higher than those without such structures, representing meaningful alpha generation over multi-year periods. This performance differential directly supports advisor confidence in recommending alternatives to clients and justifies the anticipated allocation increases.
Asset managers face capacity and capability constraints in meeting institutional demand. Industry surveys indicate that many managers remain unable to offer direct indexing capabilities or liquid alternative funds, creating friction in advisor adoption. Broadridge's client success team has acknowledged these limitations while the broader industry faces intensified competitive pressure as traditional asset managers aggressively expand alternatives offerings. The alternatives marketplace has grown significantly more competitive, yet platform infrastructure has not kept pace with market expectations, leaving advisors unable to efficiently implement their strategic allocation preferences for clients.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.