Key Takeaways
- • Oppenheimer senior research analyst Chris Kotowski argues that alternative asset managers remain inexpensive while still growing, per a CNBC 'The Exchange' appearance.
- • Kotowski's comments came in the context of a mixed quarter for big U.S. banks.
- • Oppenheimer previously downgraded major U.S. investment banks, including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, and favored alternative asset managers, according to a June 30, 2026 report.
- • The publicly available interview text is brief; the full valuation and growth figures are not included in the source material.
Summary
The view is consistent with Oppenheimer's broader positioning. According to a report dated June 30, 2026, Oppenheimer downgraded major U.S. investment banks including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley and backed alternative asset managers. Earlier coverage of the same call described the bank downgrades as arguing that rich valuations left little room for further upside, and named Ares Management, Blackstone and Bank of America among the companies discussed.
Other Oppenheimer commentary in the publisher's archive has pointed to the same theme. Kotowski has said that investment banks are expensive and no longer systemically undervalued, and Oppenheimer analysts have anticipated solid mid-teens growth in fee-paying assets under management for alternative managers despite credit concerns. Those remarks come from separate appearances and should be read as context rather than as details of the current segment.
For allocators, the core message is relative valuation: Oppenheimer sees alternative managers as undervalued relative to traditional investment banks while their fee-earning asset bases continue to expand.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.