Key Takeaways
- • Bitwise's Senior Investment Strategist Juan Leon argues Bitcoin's price floor is rising despite concurrent headwinds from a $1 trillion AI spending boom and stalled U.S. crypto legislation, with Bitcoin trading at $63,195 above its 20-day moving average as of July 9, 2026.
- • Institutional Bitcoin ETF holders, including Bitwise's BITB product, demonstrate "diamond hands" behavior by buying price pullbacks rather than panic-selling, creating structural support for downside prices during market corrections.
- • A bifurcation exists among institutional allocators: one segment actively deploys capital on dips, while a second cohort remains sidelined pending regulatory clarity from pending legislation including the Clarity Act and other crypto framework bills stalled in Congress.
- • AI's trillion-dollar infrastructure spending spree is temporarily competing for institutional capital allocation, but Leon characterizes this as a cyclical delay rather than a structural threat to Bitcoin's long-term institutional adoption timeline.
- • Bitcoin's funding rate stands at 0.01%, indicating limited leverage and market overheating, with bullish technical signals including a favorable MACD configuration supporting the rising floor thesis.
Summary
Bitwise presented a bullish thesis on July 9, 2026, arguing that Bitcoin's downside support is strengthening despite multiple near-term market headwinds. Juan Leon, Bitwise's Senior Investment Strategist, made the case that the largest cryptocurrency's price floor—the lowest support level during market corrections—continues to ratchet higher than in previous market cycles, even as a trillion-dollar AI infrastructure spending wave and delayed regulatory clarity create friction for broader institutional adoption.
The core of Leon's argument rests on observed behavioral divergence among institutional investors. Bitcoin ETF holders, particularly those in Bitwise's BITB product, have demonstrated what the firm characterizes as "diamond hands"—the tendency to hold through volatility rather than capitulate during drawdowns. This disciplined institutional bid during price pullbacks naturally creates a rising floor by establishing higher floor prices across successive market cycles. Simultaneously, a second cohort of potential institutional allocators remains parked on the sidelines, specifically awaiting movement on the Clarity Act and other pending crypto legislation grinding through Congress. These conservative deployers require regulatory certainty and legal framework clarity before their compliance teams will authorize meaningful capital commitments.
Leon acknowledged the material near-term competitive dynamic created by hyperscale companies' massive AI infrastructure expenditures, projected to exceed $1 trillion cumulatively across 2025 and 2026. For asset allocators operating with finite capital budgets and limited risk tolerance, AI has become the "shinier object," temporarily capturing flows that might otherwise reach crypto markets. However, Leon framed this capital reallocation as cyclical rather than structural—a delay in institutional adoption rather than a fundamental diminishment of Bitcoin's value proposition.
Technical metrics as of early July 2026 supported the constructive outlook, with Bitcoin trading at $63,195 above its 20-day moving average and displaying a bullish MACD configuration. The funding rate of 0.01% indicated minimal leverage positioning and low market overheating, suggesting institutional positioning remained disciplined and the rally lacked speculative excess typical of unsustainable price moves.
The core of Leon's argument rests on observed behavioral divergence among institutional investors. Bitcoin ETF holders, particularly those in Bitwise's BITB product, have demonstrated what the firm characterizes as "diamond hands"—the tendency to hold through volatility rather than capitulate during drawdowns. This disciplined institutional bid during price pullbacks naturally creates a rising floor by establishing higher floor prices across successive market cycles. Simultaneously, a second cohort of potential institutional allocators remains parked on the sidelines, specifically awaiting movement on the Clarity Act and other pending crypto legislation grinding through Congress. These conservative deployers require regulatory certainty and legal framework clarity before their compliance teams will authorize meaningful capital commitments.
Leon acknowledged the material near-term competitive dynamic created by hyperscale companies' massive AI infrastructure expenditures, projected to exceed $1 trillion cumulatively across 2025 and 2026. For asset allocators operating with finite capital budgets and limited risk tolerance, AI has become the "shinier object," temporarily capturing flows that might otherwise reach crypto markets. However, Leon framed this capital reallocation as cyclical rather than structural—a delay in institutional adoption rather than a fundamental diminishment of Bitcoin's value proposition.
Technical metrics as of early July 2026 supported the constructive outlook, with Bitcoin trading at $63,195 above its 20-day moving average and displaying a bullish MACD configuration. The funding rate of 0.01% indicated minimal leverage positioning and low market overheating, suggesting institutional positioning remained disciplined and the rally lacked speculative excess typical of unsustainable price moves.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.