Key Takeaways
- • CFTC Chairman Michael Selig announced on November 3 that perpetual futures tied to individual stocks could begin trading on qualifying US exchanges, extending the May authorization of Bitcoin perpetual futures.
- • CME Group and a coalition including Cboe Global Markets and Citadel Securities are challenging the CFTC's approach, arguing perpetual contracts resemble swaps and fall under different capital, reporting and collateral rules.
- • Perpetual futures carry no fixed expiration and rely on periodic funding payments, and at 20x leverage a roughly 5% adverse move can exhaust initial margin, raising the risk of forced liquidations.
- • CME CEO Terry Duffy has repeatedly warned that broader access could expose less experienced traders to elevated risk.
- • Kalshi has moved into regulated perpetual futures, Coinbase is expanding US derivatives infrastructure after its clearinghouse approval, and Webull plans to offer crypto perpetuals through Kalshi's infrastructure.
Summary
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission's push to bring perpetual futures into regulated markets is meeting growing resistance from Wall Street exchanges, which warn that highly leveraged contracts could expose investors to sudden liquidations and broader market instability. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig announced on November 3 that perpetual futures tied to individual stocks could begin trading on qualifying US exchanges. The decision followed the agency's May authorization of Bitcoin perpetual futures, which extends a trading model previously concentrated on offshore cryptocurrency platforms.
CME Group and a coalition involving Cboe Global Markets and Citadel Securities are challenging the regulator's approach, arguing that existing futures rules may not adequately address the products' risks. CME contends that perpetual contracts resemble swaps because they involve ongoing funding payments and lack conventional settlement dates. Swaps generally face different regulatory requirements covering capital, reporting and collateral. CME's earlier legal challenge has become part of a broader dispute over whether regulators are applying the correct investor protections to cryptocurrency-style products.
Perpetual contracts have no fixed expiration, allowing traders to maintain positions indefinitely subject to margin requirements and periodic funding payments meant to keep contract prices aligned with underlying markets. Because traders control positions larger than their collateral, the products can amplify both gains and losses. At 20x leverage, a trader posting $1,000 obtains $20,000 in exposure, and a roughly 5% adverse price move could exhaust initial margin before fees and maintenance requirements. When collateral falls below required levels, platforms may automatically close positions, and the resulting forced selling can intensify declines, creating feedback loops similar to previous Bitcoin liquidation waves. CME CEO Terry Duffy has repeatedly argued that expanding access could increase risks for less experienced traders.
The expansion is also creating opportunities for newer platforms. Kalshi has moved into regulated perpetual futures, Coinbase continues to expand its US derivatives infrastructure following its clearinghouse approval, and Webull has announced plans to introduce crypto perpetual futures through Kalshi's infrastructure, potentially broadening retail access. Supporters argue that bringing perpetual contracts under US supervision offers stronger transparency and customer protections than trading concentrated on offshore exchanges.
CME Group and a coalition involving Cboe Global Markets and Citadel Securities are challenging the regulator's approach, arguing that existing futures rules may not adequately address the products' risks. CME contends that perpetual contracts resemble swaps because they involve ongoing funding payments and lack conventional settlement dates. Swaps generally face different regulatory requirements covering capital, reporting and collateral. CME's earlier legal challenge has become part of a broader dispute over whether regulators are applying the correct investor protections to cryptocurrency-style products.
Perpetual contracts have no fixed expiration, allowing traders to maintain positions indefinitely subject to margin requirements and periodic funding payments meant to keep contract prices aligned with underlying markets. Because traders control positions larger than their collateral, the products can amplify both gains and losses. At 20x leverage, a trader posting $1,000 obtains $20,000 in exposure, and a roughly 5% adverse price move could exhaust initial margin before fees and maintenance requirements. When collateral falls below required levels, platforms may automatically close positions, and the resulting forced selling can intensify declines, creating feedback loops similar to previous Bitcoin liquidation waves. CME CEO Terry Duffy has repeatedly argued that expanding access could increase risks for less experienced traders.
The expansion is also creating opportunities for newer platforms. Kalshi has moved into regulated perpetual futures, Coinbase continues to expand its US derivatives infrastructure following its clearinghouse approval, and Webull has announced plans to introduce crypto perpetual futures through Kalshi's infrastructure, potentially broadening retail access. Supporters argue that bringing perpetual contracts under US supervision offers stronger transparency and customer protections than trading concentrated on offshore exchanges.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.