Key Takeaways
- • Nigeria's reported decline from second to sixth place in global cryptocurrency adoption rankings was highlighted at a FlashChange webinar as a sign that strong retail usage is not translating into an institutionally supported digital asset ecosystem.
- • Panelists cited Chainalysis tools costing as much as $40,000 annually and the Securities and Exchange Commission's N2 billion minimum capital requirement for digital asset exchanges as barriers that could concentrate the market among well-capitalised firms.
- • Stakeholders cited a 1.5 percent stamp duty on crypto transactions versus 0.5 percent for traditional financial services, arguing the disparity disadvantages compliant platforms.
- • Panelists cited more than 200 licensed crypto businesses in South Africa compared with 14 in Nigeria, and urged proportionate licensing and capital rules.
- • The Nigeria Revenue Service's review of its virtual asset tax guidelines was presented as an opportunity to address industry concerns.
Summary
At a webinar hosted by digital asset platform FlashChange, titled 'Beyond the Framework: The Realities of Building Crypto in Nigeria,' industry stakeholders argued that Nigeria's cryptocurrency sector needs more than widespread retail adoption to compete globally. Obinna Iwuno, chief executive officer of CBC Blockchain Services, delivered the keynote. A panel including tax expert Olabode Ezekiel and Chiemeka Ohiajionu, partner at Ducrest, discussed the regulatory ecosystem, moderated by Nuratulahi Yishawu, legal and compliance officer at FlashChange, according to the BusinessDay report.
A central theme was Nigeria's reported fall from second to sixth place in global cryptocurrency adoption rankings. Participants said the country needs a regulatory environment that supports institutional participation, a predictable tax framework and compliance requirements that protect consumers without excluding credible businesses. The United States was cited as a comparison, with regulated investment products and growing institutional involvement contributing to its market prominence. The panel stressed that Nigeria should not replicate another country's model wholesale, but establish clear and predictable rules.
Compliance costs were a major concern for virtual asset service providers, which must fund transaction monitoring, anti-money laundering controls, cybersecurity and customer verification. Panelists cited Chainalysis tools, reportedly costing as much as $40,000 annually, and questioned the impact of the SEC's N2 billion minimum capital requirement for digital asset exchanges. They warned that such requirements could restrict competition and favour a small number of well-capitalised firms, and called for proportionate regulation scaled to business size, activity and risk.
Taxation was another focus. Panelists criticised a cited 1.5 percent stamp duty on crypto transactions against 0.5 percent for traditional financial services, arguing that excessive costs could push users away from regulated platforms. They pointed to the Nigeria Revenue Service's review of its released guidelines as an opportunity to align the framework with industry realities.
The webinar also compared Nigeria with South Africa, which panelists said has over 200 licensed crypto businesses versus 14 in Nigeria. Speakers called for clearer licensing processes, practical compliance guidance, predictable timelines and capital requirements proportionate to risk. The stakeholders concluded that the choice is not between regulation and innovation, and that Nigeria's task is to enable both.
A central theme was Nigeria's reported fall from second to sixth place in global cryptocurrency adoption rankings. Participants said the country needs a regulatory environment that supports institutional participation, a predictable tax framework and compliance requirements that protect consumers without excluding credible businesses. The United States was cited as a comparison, with regulated investment products and growing institutional involvement contributing to its market prominence. The panel stressed that Nigeria should not replicate another country's model wholesale, but establish clear and predictable rules.
Compliance costs were a major concern for virtual asset service providers, which must fund transaction monitoring, anti-money laundering controls, cybersecurity and customer verification. Panelists cited Chainalysis tools, reportedly costing as much as $40,000 annually, and questioned the impact of the SEC's N2 billion minimum capital requirement for digital asset exchanges. They warned that such requirements could restrict competition and favour a small number of well-capitalised firms, and called for proportionate regulation scaled to business size, activity and risk.
Taxation was another focus. Panelists criticised a cited 1.5 percent stamp duty on crypto transactions against 0.5 percent for traditional financial services, arguing that excessive costs could push users away from regulated platforms. They pointed to the Nigeria Revenue Service's review of its released guidelines as an opportunity to align the framework with industry realities.
The webinar also compared Nigeria with South Africa, which panelists said has over 200 licensed crypto businesses versus 14 in Nigeria. Speakers called for clearer licensing processes, practical compliance guidance, predictable timelines and capital requirements proportionate to risk. The stakeholders concluded that the choice is not between regulation and innovation, and that Nigeria's task is to enable both.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.