Key Takeaways
- • Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche have experienced significant price declines (down 50%+ year-over-year) despite fundamental improvements in network activity and transaction costs, revealing a divergence between on-chain metrics and market sentiment.
- • A record 40.2 million ETH—representing one-third of Ethereum's total supply—was staked by Q2 2026, with institutional investors (ETFs, corporate treasuries, and large holders) driving the majority of new validator inflows.
- • Network economics shifted decisively toward user accessibility: blockspace became cheaper and more abundant across all three networks, while transaction volumes increased, but protocol revenues declined sharply due to intentional protocol design prioritizing throughput over extraction.
- • Staking participation remained elevated across networks (Solana 68%, Avalanche 41%), but reward dilution accelerated as more validators shared the same pool of new token issuance, pressuring yields lower and creating dilution risk for non-staking holders.
- • Bitwise's inaugural quarterly staking report attributes the decline in network revenues primarily to protocol-level design choices expanding blockspace supply, rather than falling user demand, signaling a structural shift in blockchain economics toward scalability.
Summary
Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche have entered a period of technical strength obscured by weak token valuations. Each network has become demonstrably busier and cheaper to use over the past 12 months, even as ETH, SOL, and AVAX have each fallen by roughly 50% or more from 2025 levels. According to Kam Benbrik, Bitwise's Head of Onchain Research, this disconnect reflects a fundamental divergence: "We've seen a big divergence between network fundamentals and market sentiment because, obviously, prices are down compared to 2025. But what we're seeing onchain is, first, that blockchains are becoming cheaper, and second, onchain activity is actually increasing."
The institutionalization of staking has accelerated significantly, particularly on Ethereum. Bitwise's inaugural quarterly staking report documents that a record 40.2 million ETH—representing one-third of the cryptocurrency's total supply—was staked by the end of Q2 2026. The sources of these inflows reveal a structural shift: institutional participants including ETFs, corporate treasuries, and large holders accounted for the majority of new validator deposits during the year. This institutional embrace of staking signals confidence in the networks' long-term protocol stability, even amid price pressure.
However, the economics of staking have become less attractive for individual participants. Network revenues declined sharply across all three protocols, driven primarily by deliberate protocol design choices that expanded blockspace supply and reduced transaction costs rather than by weaker underlying demand. Bitwise emphasized this distinction: "The decline in revenue was driven mainly by protocol design, as networks made blockspace cheaper and more abundant. Weaker demand played a part in some cases, but it was not the general trend." Staking participation ratios remained robust—Solana at 68%, Avalanche at 41%—yet the spread of rewards across a larger validator base compressed yields. This creates an implicit penalty for non-stakers: since most rewards on Ethereum and Solana are funded through new token issuance, those choosing not to participate face dilution.
The architectural choices underlying these outcomes reflect a deliberate trade-off favoring scalability and user accessibility over protocol revenue maximization. Networks prioritized reducing friction for developers and users over maintaining high fee environments, a strategic pivot that explains why transaction volumes increased despite lower profitability. For institutional investors and fund managers evaluating these ecosystems, the divergence between on-chain fundamentals and token prices presents a critical analytical puzzle: whether the price weakness reflects temporary sentiment disconnects or genuine concerns about long-term value capture in increasingly commoditized blockchain infrastructure.
The institutionalization of staking has accelerated significantly, particularly on Ethereum. Bitwise's inaugural quarterly staking report documents that a record 40.2 million ETH—representing one-third of the cryptocurrency's total supply—was staked by the end of Q2 2026. The sources of these inflows reveal a structural shift: institutional participants including ETFs, corporate treasuries, and large holders accounted for the majority of new validator deposits during the year. This institutional embrace of staking signals confidence in the networks' long-term protocol stability, even amid price pressure.
However, the economics of staking have become less attractive for individual participants. Network revenues declined sharply across all three protocols, driven primarily by deliberate protocol design choices that expanded blockspace supply and reduced transaction costs rather than by weaker underlying demand. Bitwise emphasized this distinction: "The decline in revenue was driven mainly by protocol design, as networks made blockspace cheaper and more abundant. Weaker demand played a part in some cases, but it was not the general trend." Staking participation ratios remained robust—Solana at 68%, Avalanche at 41%—yet the spread of rewards across a larger validator base compressed yields. This creates an implicit penalty for non-stakers: since most rewards on Ethereum and Solana are funded through new token issuance, those choosing not to participate face dilution.
The architectural choices underlying these outcomes reflect a deliberate trade-off favoring scalability and user accessibility over protocol revenue maximization. Networks prioritized reducing friction for developers and users over maintaining high fee environments, a strategic pivot that explains why transaction volumes increased despite lower profitability. For institutional investors and fund managers evaluating these ecosystems, the divergence between on-chain fundamentals and token prices presents a critical analytical puzzle: whether the price weakness reflects temporary sentiment disconnects or genuine concerns about long-term value capture in increasingly commoditized blockchain infrastructure.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.