Key Takeaways
- • The House Ways and Means Committee voted 38-5 to remove a tax deferral provision from the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act (H.R. 10357) that would have permitted staking and mining operators to defer taxes on digital asset rewards until sale.
- • The removal maintains tax parity between cryptocurrency rewards and other forms of investment income, preventing preferential treatment that could redirect capital away from traditional banking activities that support local lending.
- • The Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act advances despite the removal, signaling continued legislative attention to clarifying cryptocurrency tax treatment, though without the favorable deferral mechanism sought by the crypto industry.
- • The American Bankers Association explicitly supported the removal, emphasizing that crypto holdings lack the economic benefit of bank deposits, which fund local small business lending.
Summary
The House Ways and Means Committee approved the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act (H.R. 10357) on September 16, 2026, but stripped a significant provision that would have allowed cryptocurrency staking and mining entities to defer taxes on their rewards. The committee voted 38-5 to eliminate the deferral language, reflecting bipartisan concern over granting preferential tax treatment to digital assets relative to traditional investment income.
The removed provision would have enabled staking and mining operators—entities that validate blockchain transactions and earn digital asset rewards—to postpone tax recognition until they liquidated their holdings. This structure would have mirrored tax deferral mechanisms available in certain traditional investment contexts, but lawmakers determined it exceeded appropriate parity with other income sources.
The American Bankers Association welcomed the committee's decision, with President and CEO Rob Nichols stating that the removal upheld a foundational tax principle: "Taxing similar income the same way, regardless of the asset that produces it, is a bedrock principle of a fair tax code." Nichols emphasized that the distinction matters critically because traditional bank deposits fund local small business lending—an activity with documented economic multiplier effects—while cryptocurrency holdings do not generate comparable local economic activity. He argued that providing a tax advantage to crypto rewards would violate tax neutrality while simultaneously redirecting capital from institutions that support community economic development.
The legislation continues advancing through Congress despite the removal, suggesting lawmakers intend to modernize digital asset taxation rules more broadly. The elimination of the deferral provision indicates that any clarifications to cryptocurrency tax treatment will occur within a framework that maintains parity with conventional investment income rather than granting the industry specialized advantages.
The removed provision would have enabled staking and mining operators—entities that validate blockchain transactions and earn digital asset rewards—to postpone tax recognition until they liquidated their holdings. This structure would have mirrored tax deferral mechanisms available in certain traditional investment contexts, but lawmakers determined it exceeded appropriate parity with other income sources.
The American Bankers Association welcomed the committee's decision, with President and CEO Rob Nichols stating that the removal upheld a foundational tax principle: "Taxing similar income the same way, regardless of the asset that produces it, is a bedrock principle of a fair tax code." Nichols emphasized that the distinction matters critically because traditional bank deposits fund local small business lending—an activity with documented economic multiplier effects—while cryptocurrency holdings do not generate comparable local economic activity. He argued that providing a tax advantage to crypto rewards would violate tax neutrality while simultaneously redirecting capital from institutions that support community economic development.
The legislation continues advancing through Congress despite the removal, suggesting lawmakers intend to modernize digital asset taxation rules more broadly. The elimination of the deferral provision indicates that any clarifications to cryptocurrency tax treatment will occur within a framework that maintains parity with conventional investment income rather than granting the industry specialized advantages.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.