Key Takeaways
- • The Bank of Israel said in an Oct. 24 statement that digital currencies cannot be used to circumvent financial sanctions and urged the government to protect trade ties with its leading partners instead.
- • Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu floated a "bypass economy" in a Channel 10 interview, calling blockchain "one of" the options if banking restrictions materialize, but no crypto-based mechanism has been announced or implemented.
- • Opposition leaders Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Liberman criticized the idea ahead of the Oct. 27 election, citing traceability of blockchain records and risks to Israeli tech firms' access to foreign payments and investment.
- • Israel's fiscal buffers, including a deep domestic institutional investor base and an independent central bank, rest on access to Western capital markets, dollar clearing and foreign investment, which critics say a bypass economy would not replace.
Summary
Netanyahu raised the idea in a Channel 10 economic programming interview, saying the country must "organize itself in a bypass economy" if banking restrictions materialize. Asked whether blockchain was the alternative, he replied, "One of them, certainly." On Oct. 24 he returned to the subject in a Channel 14 interview, describing digital assets as one option among several and conceding they might never be used. He said he would weigh the central bank's counsel but retain the final decision. Neither his office nor the central bank identified a specific token, blockchain network or implementing agency, and no timetable, budget or operating framework has been published.
Opposition leaders seized on the exchange. Gadi Eisenkot, who leads the Yashar party, asked how Israeli technology firms could keep collecting foreign payments and investment if ordinary banking channels deteriorated. Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett criticized the prospect of an economy drifting away from international financial and technological relationships. Yisrael Beytenu leader Avigdor Liberman argued that blockchain transactions leave traceable trails that authorities can use to block activity tied to sanctioned entities, and said preventing sanctions should take priority over preparing alternatives.
The debate unfolds against widening Western pressure over Israeli settlement policy in the occupied West Bank. Britain and 11 other Western governments recently announced measures targeting settlement-produced goods. These steps are narrower than sanctions on Israel's banking system but have sharpened scrutiny of the country's exposure to foreign financial infrastructure. Analysts note that public blockchains record transactions permanently, and that exchanges, custodians and stablecoin issuers remain bound by sanctions rules, limiting crypto's usefulness as a shield. Israel is meanwhile building regulated digital-asset services within its existing system, including a planned crypto trading offering through its largest bank's investment app in partnership with Galaxy, starting in 2027.
The underlying question concerns the buffers that have sustained Israel's economy through 15 years of expansionary budgets, according to research on Israeli fiscal populism: a knowledge-intensive export sector, a deep domestic institutional investor base fed by mandatory pension saving, and an independent central bank that has anchored inflation expectations. During the war, the government raised NIS 646 billion between 2023 and 2025, including a record NIS 278 billion in 2024, with 81% of that year's issuance absorbed domestically at market prices and no failed auctions, despite five downgrades from the three major rating agencies. Critics argue all three buffers depend on access to Western capital markets, dollar clearing and foreign investment. More than 60 economists warned this week against isolation and sanctions.
For investors, the immediate market impact is limited: no policy has changed, no crypto reserve or settlement mechanism exists, and the central bank's opposition makes adoption unlikely near term. The significance lies in the institutional signal that a sitting prime minister publicly contemplated operating outside the Western financial system days before voters go to the polls.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.