Key Takeaways
- • JPMorgan projected XRP spot ETFs would attract $4–$8 billion in first-year inflows (January 2025), with Standard Chartered issuing identical forecasts in April 2025, based on Bitcoin ETF absorption rates of 6% of market cap and Ethereum's 3%.
- • Year-to-date XRP ETF inflows total approximately $1.5 billion across eight months of trading since mid-November 2025, representing an 81% shortfall from JPMorgan's $8 billion upper-bound forecast and a 62.5% miss on the midpoint estimate.
- • JPMorgan's original forecast explicitly conditioned strong inflows on regulatory clarity from the SEC and CFTC, citing uncertainty around altcoin status and expectations that a new administration and SEC leadership would adopt a friendlier stance toward crypto assets.
- • Standard Chartered's price roadmap was constructed entirely on the assumption of $4–$8 billion in ETF inflows, projecting XRP would reach $5.50 by end-2025, $8 in 2026, and $12.50 by 2028—targets that appear increasingly vulnerable given actual inflow performance.
- • XRP has declined more than 60% over the past year despite positive ETF fund flows and institutional demand, reflecting weakness in the broader cryptocurrency market amid geopolitical uncertainty and eroding investor confidence.
Summary
Two of Wall Street's most prominent institutional research teams significantly overestimated the appeal of spot XRP exchange-traded funds, with actual year-to-date inflows lagging their forecasts by billions of dollars. JPMorgan issued research in January 2025 projecting that XRP ETFs would capture between $4 billion and $8 billion within six to twelve months of launch, with the bank subsequently refining that range to $4.3 billion to $8.4 billion in February 2025. Standard Chartered followed suit in April 2025, with head of digital assets research Geoffrey Kendrick publishing identical $4–$8 billion inflow projections. Both forecasts were predicated on historical absorption rates observed in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, which captured approximately 6% and 3% of their respective market capitalizations during their first-year trading periods.
Since XRP spot ETFs commenced trading in mid-November 2025, cumulative net inflows have reached only $1.5 billion after more than eight months of operation. This represents a dramatic shortfall: approximately 81% below JPMorgan's $8 billion upper bound and roughly 62.5% below the midpoint of institutional expectations. The underperformance is particularly striking because both JPMorgan and Standard Chartered explicitly conditioned their bullish inflow scenarios on clarification of XRP's regulatory status at the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. At the time forecasts were issued, regulatory resolution appeared imminent under an incoming administration expected to adopt a more crypto-friendly regulatory posture.
Standard Chartered's analysis proved especially vulnerable to the actual inflow dynamics. Kendrick constructed an entire price roadmap on the assumption that ETFs would deliver $4–$8 billion in first-year flows, projecting XRP would reach $5.50 by December 2025, $8 by 2026, and $12.50 by 2028—sufficient to overtake Ethereum's market capitalization. The material divergence between forecast and reality raises questions about both the underlying methodological assumptions and the degree to which regulatory uncertainty persisted despite institutional expectations of a friendlier policy environment.
The broader context of XRP's market performance compounds the inflow disappointment. Despite attracting $1.5 billion in ETF capital and sustaining institutional investor interest, XRP has declined more than 60% over the preceding twelve months. This disconnect between fund inflows and price performance suggests that positive ETF demand has been overwhelmed by broader cryptocurrency market weakness, heightened geopolitical risk, and deteriorating investor confidence across digital assets. The cumulative effect highlights the constraints on ETF flows as a monolithic driver of asset class performance when macro headwinds and sentiment shifts dominate market pricing.
Since XRP spot ETFs commenced trading in mid-November 2025, cumulative net inflows have reached only $1.5 billion after more than eight months of operation. This represents a dramatic shortfall: approximately 81% below JPMorgan's $8 billion upper bound and roughly 62.5% below the midpoint of institutional expectations. The underperformance is particularly striking because both JPMorgan and Standard Chartered explicitly conditioned their bullish inflow scenarios on clarification of XRP's regulatory status at the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. At the time forecasts were issued, regulatory resolution appeared imminent under an incoming administration expected to adopt a more crypto-friendly regulatory posture.
Standard Chartered's analysis proved especially vulnerable to the actual inflow dynamics. Kendrick constructed an entire price roadmap on the assumption that ETFs would deliver $4–$8 billion in first-year flows, projecting XRP would reach $5.50 by December 2025, $8 by 2026, and $12.50 by 2028—sufficient to overtake Ethereum's market capitalization. The material divergence between forecast and reality raises questions about both the underlying methodological assumptions and the degree to which regulatory uncertainty persisted despite institutional expectations of a friendlier policy environment.
The broader context of XRP's market performance compounds the inflow disappointment. Despite attracting $1.5 billion in ETF capital and sustaining institutional investor interest, XRP has declined more than 60% over the preceding twelve months. This disconnect between fund inflows and price performance suggests that positive ETF demand has been overwhelmed by broader cryptocurrency market weakness, heightened geopolitical risk, and deteriorating investor confidence across digital assets. The cumulative effect highlights the constraints on ETF flows as a monolithic driver of asset class performance when macro headwinds and sentiment shifts dominate market pricing.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.