Key Takeaways
- • Payward Inc. (Kraken's parent company) filed a second amended complaint in U.S. District Court in Colorado alleging that crypto custodian Etana Custody misappropriated over $25 million in client funds through a "Ponzi-like" scheme involving asset commingling, operational diversion, and risky venture investments.
- • Etana Custody, now in liquidation, allegedly delayed Kraken's attempted withdrawal of approximately $25 million in reserve funds in April 2025, citing false reconciliation problems while concealing the actual misuse of funds.
- • At least $16 million of Kraken's funds were invested in promissory notes from Seabury Trade Capital that subsequently defaulted; the complaint suggests these assets were ultimately diverted to cover Etana's operational costs rather than recovered.
- • Etana is accused of deploying customer assets for proprietary foreign exchange trading strategies and retaining profits generated from these trades, while falsely representing funds as secure to clients.
- • Kraken's litigation stance signals heightened institutional focus on custody risk management within the cryptocurrency industry, with the company's head of litigation publicly committing to pursue legal remedies against custodians that misappropriate or misrepresent client assets.
Summary
Payward Inc., the parent company of major cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, has escalated its legal action against Etana Custody and its CEO, Dion Brandon Russell, filing a second amended complaint in U.S. District Court in Colorado. The lawsuit centers on allegations that Etana Custody operated a "Ponzi-like" scheme involving the misappropriation of over $25 million in client funds. Kraken had entrusted Etana with hundreds of millions of dollars over several years to facilitate fiat-to-crypto conversions for its users.
The dispute came to a head in April 2025 when Kraken attempted to withdraw approximately $25 million in reserve funds held by Etana. According to the complaint, Etana delayed the withdrawal and provided false justifications, citing reconciliation issues while concealing the actual status of the funds. The complaint alleges that Etana engaged in systematic misuse of customer assets, including commingling funds, diverting them for operational expenses, and investing them in speculative ventures without proper authorization or disclosure.
A critical component of the alleged scheme involved at least $16 million of Kraken's funds being placed into promissory notes issued by Seabury Trade Capital. These notes subsequently defaulted without recovery, and the complaint indicates the capital was ultimately redirected to cover Etana's operating costs. Additionally, Etana is accused of using customer assets to execute its own foreign exchange trading strategies, retaining all profits generated while maintaining false representations that client funds remained secure.
Etana Custody is currently in liquidation, underscoring the scale of the operational failure. Kraken's head of litigation, Matt Turetzky, issued a forceful statement regarding the company's commitment to asset protection: "If you take our money or deceive our customers, then know this: we will find you, we will sue you, and we will not stop until justice has been served." This litigation reflects Kraken's substantial transaction volume—processing billions of dollars quarterly—and signals the broader cryptocurrency industry's growing focus on custody risk and fiduciary accountability among service providers managing institutional and retail assets.
The dispute came to a head in April 2025 when Kraken attempted to withdraw approximately $25 million in reserve funds held by Etana. According to the complaint, Etana delayed the withdrawal and provided false justifications, citing reconciliation issues while concealing the actual status of the funds. The complaint alleges that Etana engaged in systematic misuse of customer assets, including commingling funds, diverting them for operational expenses, and investing them in speculative ventures without proper authorization or disclosure.
A critical component of the alleged scheme involved at least $16 million of Kraken's funds being placed into promissory notes issued by Seabury Trade Capital. These notes subsequently defaulted without recovery, and the complaint indicates the capital was ultimately redirected to cover Etana's operating costs. Additionally, Etana is accused of using customer assets to execute its own foreign exchange trading strategies, retaining all profits generated while maintaining false representations that client funds remained secure.
Etana Custody is currently in liquidation, underscoring the scale of the operational failure. Kraken's head of litigation, Matt Turetzky, issued a forceful statement regarding the company's commitment to asset protection: "If you take our money or deceive our customers, then know this: we will find you, we will sue you, and we will not stop until justice has been served." This litigation reflects Kraken's substantial transaction volume—processing billions of dollars quarterly—and signals the broader cryptocurrency industry's growing focus on custody risk and fiduciary accountability among service providers managing institutional and retail assets.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.