Key Takeaways
- • Mike Novogratz, Galaxy Digital CEO, asserts the CLARITY Act remains viable and could advance to the Senate floor despite previous procedural delays, with negotiations continuing over the weekend as of mid-September 2026.
- • The primary legislative obstacle centers on ethics provisions that restrict elected officials from profiting from cryptocurrency during their terms in office—a sticking point requiring White House involvement to resolve.
- • Novogratz expresses 95% confidence the CLARITY Act will pass, arguing only a handful of Democratic senators block passage and urging stakeholders to "plug your nose and do it" to achieve bipartisan consensus.
- • Earlier procedural delays in July stemmed from internal disagreements within the bipartisan Senate crypto caucus, which lacks unified positioning on how to structure cryptocurrency regulatory legislation.
- • A final deal's success may hinge on White House compromise on ethics provisions, with Novogratz signaling September negotiations represent a critical window for reconciling competing stakeholder interests.
Summary
Mike Novogratz, CEO of Galaxy Digital, reiterated in mid-September 2026 that the CLARITY Act—landmark cryptocurrency regulatory legislation—remains alive despite multiple procedural setbacks and scheduled delays. According to Novogratz's public statements, negotiations continued through the preceding weekend, positioning the bill to potentially reach the Senate floor despite earlier obstruction and an initially proposed August vote window that did not materialize.
The core legislative impasse involves ethics provisions embedded in the bill that would restrict elected officials and their family members from profiting from cryptocurrency holdings or investments during their terms in office. Novogratz identified the White House's position on these provisions as a potential fulcrum for final passage, suggesting executive branch compromise could unlock bipartisan support. He characterized the remaining Democratic opposition as limited to "only a handful" of senators, implying sufficient votes exist for passage once ethics language achieves acceptable form.
Previous delays in July reflected deeper fractures within the bipartisan Senate crypto caucus, which had blocked the CLARITY Act vote due to internal disagreements over the bill's structural approach to digital asset regulation. Novogratz's public confidence—expressed as 95% certainty of passage—contrasts with these earlier procedural obstacles and reflects his assessment that momentum and deal-making have advanced materially since the summer impasse.
The path forward appears contingent on three elements: sustained negotiations between Senate sponsors and the White House on ethics language, Democratic consensus around compromise provisions, and the Senate's scheduling priorities in the post-summer legislative calendar. Novogratz's framing suggests the bill's passage hinges on accepting imperfect provisions rather than achieving consensus on ideal regulatory frameworks—a pragmatic acknowledgment of the political realities constraining cryptocurrency legislation in the current Congress.
The core legislative impasse involves ethics provisions embedded in the bill that would restrict elected officials and their family members from profiting from cryptocurrency holdings or investments during their terms in office. Novogratz identified the White House's position on these provisions as a potential fulcrum for final passage, suggesting executive branch compromise could unlock bipartisan support. He characterized the remaining Democratic opposition as limited to "only a handful" of senators, implying sufficient votes exist for passage once ethics language achieves acceptable form.
Previous delays in July reflected deeper fractures within the bipartisan Senate crypto caucus, which had blocked the CLARITY Act vote due to internal disagreements over the bill's structural approach to digital asset regulation. Novogratz's public confidence—expressed as 95% certainty of passage—contrasts with these earlier procedural obstacles and reflects his assessment that momentum and deal-making have advanced materially since the summer impasse.
The path forward appears contingent on three elements: sustained negotiations between Senate sponsors and the White House on ethics language, Democratic consensus around compromise provisions, and the Senate's scheduling priorities in the post-summer legislative calendar. Novogratz's framing suggests the bill's passage hinges on accepting imperfect provisions rather than achieving consensus on ideal regulatory frameworks—a pragmatic acknowledgment of the political realities constraining cryptocurrency legislation in the current Congress.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.